2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical comparison of continuous-time models of implied volatility indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jumps in volatility may also be important for modeling equity index 2 Dotsis et al (2007) point out that this feature is only of second order importance as the best performing model in their study is a Merton-type jump process without a mean-reversion component. Modeling volatility with this process over a long-time horizon is however problematic as in this model volatility tends to either zero or infinity in the long run.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jumps in volatility may also be important for modeling equity index 2 Dotsis et al (2007) point out that this feature is only of second order importance as the best performing model in their study is a Merton-type jump process without a mean-reversion component. Modeling volatility with this process over a long-time horizon is however problematic as in this model volatility tends to either zero or infinity in the long run.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the research of Chan et al [9] and Dotsis et al [10], we study the ability of different popular diffusion continuous-time models to analyse the dynamics of the EUA spot prices. It is necessary for the regulator to explore the dynamics to choose an appropriate pricing model and design a new trading scheme.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Emissions Allowance Spot Pricesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Testing against actual market prices will provide more definitive evidence on the merit of alternative pricing models. In the case of futures this is possible since some data do exist for futures on volatility indices (e.g., see Dotsis et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they adopted the rather restrictive assumption that the volatility jump size is constant rather than being random. Finally, Dotsis et al (2007) examined the ability of alternative popular continuous-time diffusion and jump diffusion processes to capture the dynamics of eight major European and U.S. volatility indices. They found that the best models in terms of fitting were those with random upward and downward jumps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%