2008
DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.40456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electromyographic analysis of shoulder muscle activation during push-up variations on stable and labile surfaces

Abstract: Background:Numerous exercises are used to strengthen muscles around the shoulder joint including the push-up and the push-up plus. An important consideration is the addition of surface instability in the form of swiss ball for rehabilitation and strength. The justification for the use of the swiss ball is based on its potential for increasing muscular demand required to maintain postural stability and for improving joint proprioception. Evidence for this is lacking in literature.Purpose of the Study:To compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• No statistical differences in SA activation were found between the stable and unstable surfaces for: standard push-ups, elbow push-ups, knee push-ups, and wall push-ups. 9 • When using the Cuff Link system (EFI, San Diego, CA), there was a significant difference in SA activation between the three conditions (p < .001), with the greatest SA activation during the full weight-bearing position (81.4% ± 96.63%). 10 • There was a significant hand placement effect (shoulder width, wide base, narrow base, p = .002) with differences between the shoulder width and narrow base and the wide base and narrow base.…”
Section: Evidence Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…• No statistical differences in SA activation were found between the stable and unstable surfaces for: standard push-ups, elbow push-ups, knee push-ups, and wall push-ups. 9 • When using the Cuff Link system (EFI, San Diego, CA), there was a significant difference in SA activation between the three conditions (p < .001), with the greatest SA activation during the full weight-bearing position (81.4% ± 96.63%). 10 • There was a significant hand placement effect (shoulder width, wide base, narrow base, p = .002) with differences between the shoulder width and narrow base and the wide base and narrow base.…”
Section: Evidence Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While extensive research has investigated differences in initial hand placement, joint stresses and optimizing training effectiveness [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], little attention has been given to the changes in body position over the course of an extended push-up bout when compensational movement patterns are likely to be adopted. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to compare the natural push-up body positioning from the beginning to the end of a continuous 2-minute standardized push-up assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One muscle, the serratus anterior (SA), is considered to be an important stabilizer of the scapula 4,5) . For this reason, researchers have devised many different exercises that promote the selective activation of the SA muscle 6,7) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%