2018
DOI: 10.1002/slct.201800787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Electrochemical Comparison of Single‐Walled and Multi‐Walled Carbon Nanotubes Utilizing Paeonol as the Model Drug

Abstract: Herein, we report the development of a selective and highly sensitive electrochemical sensing of paeonol at carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE). Trace amount of paeonol was quantitated by employing square wave voltammetry technique for the first time based on the electrochemical oxidation of the analyte at the modified electrodes. The single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) based sensor exhibited higher recognition ability of paeonol in comparison with the multi walled carbon nanotubes (MWNT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…on It has been reported that the surface of the glassy carbon electrode was modified with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and a composite of MWCNTs with isothiocyanate and utilized them for Fion sensing using electrochemical platform [9]. Although the MWCNTs are cheaper, the sensing merits of SWCNTs are far better than that of MWCNTs [10][11][12]. Such enhanced performance is due to structural difference between them leading to improved physicochemical properties for sensing application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on It has been reported that the surface of the glassy carbon electrode was modified with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and a composite of MWCNTs with isothiocyanate and utilized them for Fion sensing using electrochemical platform [9]. Although the MWCNTs are cheaper, the sensing merits of SWCNTs are far better than that of MWCNTs [10][11][12]. Such enhanced performance is due to structural difference between them leading to improved physicochemical properties for sensing application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in the current investigation a nano hybrid material of single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles along with nafion have been exploited for the first time for SSZ determination. SWNT is one of the most propitious candidates for the modification of sensors due to its potential features such as high electrical conductivity, remarkable electron transport capacity, significantly large surface area and excellent mechanical strength [26–30] . Fe 3 O 4 on the other hand, manifests strong adsorption ability, high abundance, low mass transfer resistance, biocompatibility, low toxicity and phenomenal magnetic and electrochemical properties [31–34] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former consists of a single graphite sheet seamlessly wrapped into a cylindrical tube, while the latter comprises an array of such nanotubes that are concentrically nested like the rings of a tree trunk [8]. For sensing applications, SWCNTs promise a higher sensitivity compared with MWCNTs, which can be ascribed to their increased surface-to-volume ratio, and thus an increased number of unsaturated bonds that can act as reaction sites for the sensing specimen [16]. From an economic point of view, the increased sensitivity goes along with an increased product price, as the yield and the purity of SWCNT synthesis protocols is commonly lower than the ones for MWCNTs [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%