2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications 2012
DOI: 10.1109/trustcom.2012.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Trust Management System for Balancing the Safety and Location Privacy in VANETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Please check out the publisher version at http://tr.ietejournals.org/. Posted with permission of the Editor-in-Chief 11 [3] x [4] x [5] x [6] x x [7] x [8] x x [9] x [10] x [11] x [12] x [13] x [14] x x [15] NO [16] x [17] x [18] x [19] x [20] x x x [21] x [22] x [23] x [24] x [25] x [26] x x [27] x [28] x [29] x [30] x [31] x [32] x [33] x [34] x x [35] x x [36] x [37] x [38] x [39] x [40] x [41] x…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Please check out the publisher version at http://tr.ietejournals.org/. Posted with permission of the Editor-in-Chief 11 [3] x [4] x [5] x [6] x x [7] x [8] x x [9] x [10] x [11] x [12] x [13] x [14] x x [15] NO [16] x [17] x [18] x [19] x [20] x x x [21] x [22] x [23] x [24] x [25] x [26] x x [27] x [28] x [29] x [30] x [31] x [32] x [33] x [34] x x [35] x x [36] x [37] x [38] x [39] x [40] x [41] x…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a difference with vehicular trust assumptions, only two proposals ( [3], [38]) do not include any consideration on this issue. The remaining ones have specified the required type of credential.…”
Section: ) Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5], ESA [17], IBGS [18], GSIS [19], IBV [20], EGSS [21], iTrust [22], PMBP [23] STRM [13], TRIP [24], RaBTM [25] Non-infrastructure based ETM [26], MTM [27], LSOT [28], BTM [29] CTID [14], ITM [15], RMCV [30], ERM [31], VARS [32], TMEP [33], CRMS [34] Trust management schemes in the second category require infrastructure including roadside unit or central authority without using PKI [13,24,25]. Schemes such as Trust and Reputation Infrastructure-based Proposal (TRIP) [24] and road side unit (RSU) and Beacon-Based Trust Management (RaBTM) [25] may not work if infrastructure is not available. In the third category, the issue of message trustworthiness was investigated based on PKI in an infrastructure-less environment [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these previous trust management systems assume every vehicle communicates with a unique ID rather than pseudonyms, which is not practical in VANETs due to privacy issues. The RaBTM [18] (roadside unit and beaconbased trust management system) employs pseudonyms in the reputation system to enhance privacy preservation. We will make comparisons with RaBTM and highlight the feature of our work in Section 6.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%