2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient methodology for fatigue damage assessment of bridge details using modal superposition of stress intensity factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of these two models usually provides a faster solution with respect to the entire detailed model to achieve accurate results within the RoI. This strategy has been widely used to solve problems in different engineering fields including structural mechanics, electromagnetics, and thermofluid dynamics …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of these two models usually provides a faster solution with respect to the entire detailed model to achieve accurate results within the RoI. This strategy has been widely used to solve problems in different engineering fields including structural mechanics, electromagnetics, and thermofluid dynamics …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The safety of such infrastructures has posed a critical concern for countries residing in the cold region. [8][9][10][11][12] However, the Paris material constants used in estimating the fatigue life in these design codes derive primarily from the experimental database recorded at the room temperature. 2,3 A number of design procedures [4][5][6][7] have evolved for the fatigue prone structural details, based on a Paris type crack propagation rule, to assess the fatigue performance of steel bridges and Nomenclature: a, = crack length; a 0 , = initial crack length at the end of fatigue pre-cracking; A, = percentage of elongation at fracture; B, = thickness of the compact tension, C(T), specimen; C, = Paris-law coefficient; C 0 , = coefficient of stress intensity factor gradient method; E, = elastic modulus; f y , = yield strength; f u , = ultimate tensile strength; K I , = stress intensity factor; ΔK I , = stress intensity factor range; ΔK th , = fatigue crack propagation threshold; m, = exponent of the Paris-law; N, = number of loading cycles; P max , = maximum load; ΔP, = applied cyclic load range; R, = stress ratio; R 2 , = correlation coefficient; T, = temperature; T 27J , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the Charpy impact energy is 27 J; T SA , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the percent shear area of fracture surface in a Charpy specimen is 50%; T t , = fracture ductile-tobrittle transition temperature based on Boltzmann function; W, = width of compact tension, C(T), specimen; Z, = percentage of area reduction other welded steel structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 A number of design procedures [4][5][6][7] have evolved for the fatigue prone structural details, based on a Paris type crack propagation rule, to assess the fatigue performance of steel bridges and Nomenclature: a, = crack length; a 0 , = initial crack length at the end of fatigue pre-cracking; A, = percentage of elongation at fracture; B, = thickness of the compact tension, C(T), specimen; C, = Paris-law coefficient; C 0 , = coefficient of stress intensity factor gradient method; E, = elastic modulus; f y , = yield strength; f u , = ultimate tensile strength; K I , = stress intensity factor; ΔK I , = stress intensity factor range; ΔK th , = fatigue crack propagation threshold; m, = exponent of the Paris-law; N, = number of loading cycles; P max , = maximum load; ΔP, = applied cyclic load range; R, = stress ratio; R 2 , = correlation coefficient; T, = temperature; T 27J , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the Charpy impact energy is 27 J; T SA , = fracture ductile-to-brittle transition temperature at which the percent shear area of fracture surface in a Charpy specimen is 50%; T t , = fracture ductile-tobrittle transition temperature based on Boltzmann function; W, = width of compact tension, C(T), specimen; Z, = percentage of area reduction other welded steel structures. [8][9][10][11][12] However, the Paris material constants used in estimating the fatigue life in these design codes derive primarily from the experimental database recorded at the room temperature. Their validity of these parameters at a low ambient temperature requires further validation for enhanced fatigue assessment of welded components in steel bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars gradually adopted the fracture mechanics method to study the fatigue crack propagation of welded details with initial defect (Nagy, Wang, Culek, Van Bogaert, & De Backer, 2017). As an essential parameter in fracture mechanics, the stress intensity factor not only determines the crack growth of the welded details but also has a direct effect on the prediction accuracy of the fatigue life (Albuquerque, Silva, de Jesus, & Calçada, 2015;Duchaczek & Mańko, 2015). Many methods have been developed to solve stress intensity factors, such as analytical method, numerical method and experimental method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%