2022
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2022.3161269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Maximum-Likelihood-Like Algorithm for Near-Field Coherent Source Localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Te ML method can be deployed to examine the behaviour of channel data parameters. Tis study employs the likelihood function [40][41][42] to determine the ML estimation parameters in the measured pathloss data. Specifcally, the likelihood function of the lognormal distribution for P i (i � 1, 2, 3, .…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te ML method can be deployed to examine the behaviour of channel data parameters. Tis study employs the likelihood function [40][41][42] to determine the ML estimation parameters in the measured pathloss data. Specifcally, the likelihood function of the lognormal distribution for P i (i � 1, 2, 3, .…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods for near-field localization, such as those described in 2 , 11 13 , 23 – 29 , rely on a simplified version of the exact model. In the near-field, unlike the far-field, the distance between the source and each element in the receiver array cannot be neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above algorithms are based on simplified spatial models [ 18 ] that are approximated by second-order Taylor series expansion, so model errors are unavoidable. In addition, the elimination of parameters in the simplified model is usually conducted to avoid 2D search, which does not utilize all the data in the cumulant matrix and thus increases the estimation error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%