2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient computational approach for heat source optimization in numerical simulations of arc welding processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternate view is to fit the efficiency value via an experimental investigation. Farias et al [60] conducted a study where both butt joint and lap joint welds for AISI 1020 carbon steel and AISI 304 stainless steel were performed experimentally with thermocouples embedded into the work pieces. The temperature evolution and weld cross section were then used to find a set of parameters for both the efficiency and the other Goldak heat source parameters in equation 2.1 that resulted in the closest match between simulation and experiment for a FEM simulation using a Goldak-type heat source.…”
Section: Efficiency Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternate view is to fit the efficiency value via an experimental investigation. Farias et al [60] conducted a study where both butt joint and lap joint welds for AISI 1020 carbon steel and AISI 304 stainless steel were performed experimentally with thermocouples embedded into the work pieces. The temperature evolution and weld cross section were then used to find a set of parameters for both the efficiency and the other Goldak heat source parameters in equation 2.1 that resulted in the closest match between simulation and experiment for a FEM simulation using a Goldak-type heat source.…”
Section: Efficiency Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the standard assumption for Goldak-type heat sources [43,60,61] of the paraboloids accounting for 95% of the heat input, ABD are estimated in [55] through taking 95% of the heat source. Thus for the x-direction taking q as 5% of its maximum to be at x = a, mathematically equivalent to q(a, 0, 0) = 0.05q(0, 0, 0), results in 0.05q(0) = q(0)e −Aa 2 (4.39)…”
Section: Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6,9 Numerical simulation methods have been employed by different research groups to predict GMAW thermal field, weld zone profile. 1,[9][10][11] For numerical analysis of the weld profile heat source models such as Gaussian, double ellipsoidal, conical, and equivalent heat sources have been used successfully. 1,10,12 The analytical type of model is suitable for electron beam and laser welding processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reliable output results of the simulation model, it is necessary to determine the exact values of these input parameters. In the case of individual simulations, we can achieve this goal, minimizing the error between the simulation and experimental results by combining the simulation model with some multivariable optimization algorithm [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The complexity of the problem arises when it is necessary to determine the optimal values of these parameters for several different simulations [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%