2020 16th IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing &Amp; Its Applications (CSPA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cspa48992.2020.9068691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Approach to EEG-Based Emotion Recognition using LSTM Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of the two classes with the attention LSTM showed an accuracy of 90.1% and 87.9% for valence analysis and arousal analysis under the four-fold cross validation method. The accuracy of the two-level classification emotion recognition in the previous studies was approximately 57.0–94.7% in terms of valance and 62.0–93.1% for arousal analysis [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 16 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The three-level emotion classification results were 53.4–60.7% for valance analysis and 46.0–62.33% for arousal analysis, which are lower than those obtained using the two-level classification [ 7 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classification of the two classes with the attention LSTM showed an accuracy of 90.1% and 87.9% for valence analysis and arousal analysis under the four-fold cross validation method. The accuracy of the two-level classification emotion recognition in the previous studies was approximately 57.0–94.7% in terms of valance and 62.0–93.1% for arousal analysis [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 16 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The three-level emotion classification results were 53.4–60.7% for valance analysis and 46.0–62.33% for arousal analysis, which are lower than those obtained using the two-level classification [ 7 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They confirmed that the accuracy of the valence was 85.4% and that of the arousal was 85.6% in two-level classification. Anubhav et al proposed an LSTM-based emotion recognition approach that calculates the band power of the EEG signal and inputs the frequency characteristics [ 24 ]. The DEAP dataset was applied to the model, and the accuracy was 94.69% for valence recognition and 93.13% for arousal recognition in two-level classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSTM deep learning model is used extensively in signal processing studies in recent years. Since LSTM has short and long term memory units, it shows more successful results in signal classification studies compared to other methods (Nath et al, 2020).…”
Section: Classification With Lstm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soleymani et al [34] proposed a LSTM-RNN and continuous conditional random field algorithm to detect the emotional state of the subjects from their EEG signals and facial expressions. Anubhav et al [1] proposed a LSTM neural network, and which could efficiently learn the features from the the band power of EEG signals. Fourati et al [8] presented an Echo State Network (ESN), which applied recursive layer to perform the feature extraction step directly from the EEG raw.…”
Section: Eeg Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%