2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effectively adaptive selective cuckoo search algorithm for solving three complicated short-term hydrothermal scheduling problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and let v † (W) and v † (W) denote the respective optimal objective function values for (5) and (6). Analogously to the construction of M(W), let M(W), M † (W), and M † (W) denote the respective optimal solution sets for (3), (5), and (6); these and M(W) are all nonempty compact sets.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and let v † (W) and v † (W) denote the respective optimal objective function values for (5) and (6). Analogously to the construction of M(W), let M(W), M † (W), and M † (W) denote the respective optimal solution sets for (3), (5), and (6); these and M(W) are all nonempty compact sets.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many process engineering problems may be formulated and approached as optimization problems. Typical examples include seeking optimal operating conditions for combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) systems [1][2][3]; seeking optimal schedules for thermal power plants [4,5]; and maximizing recovered energy in heat-waste recovery systems [6,7], subject to thermodynamic and financial constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem has been studied so far and obtained many intentions from researchers. Several algorithms, such as Gradient Search Algorithm (GSA) [2], Newton-Raphson Method (NRM) [3], Hopfield Neural Networks (HNN) [4], Simulated Annealing Algorithm (SAA) [5], Evolutionary Programming Algorithm (EPA) [6][7][8], Genetic Algorithm (GA) [9], modified EPA (MEPA) [10], Fast Evolutionary Programming Algorithm (FEPA) [10], Improved FEPA (IFEPA) [10], Hybrid EPA (HEPA) [11], Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [12], Improved Bacterial Foraging Algorithm (IBFA) [13], Self-Organization Particle Swarm Optimization (SOPSO) [14], Running IFEPA (RIFEPA) [15], Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (IPSO) [16,17], Clonal Selection Optimization Algorithm (CSOA) [18], Full Information Particle Swarm Optimization (FIPSO) [19], One-Rank Cuckoo Search Algorithm with the applications of Cauchy (ORCSA-Cauchy) and Lévy distribution (ORCSA-Lévy) [20], Cuckoo Search Algorithm with the applications of Gaussian distribution (CSA-Gauss), Cauchy distribution (CSA-Cauchy), and Lévy distribution (CSA-Lévy) [21], Adaptive Cuckoo Search Algorithm (ACSA) [22], Improved Cuckoo Search Algorithm (ICSA) [23], Modified Cuckoo Search Algorithm (MCSA) [24], and Adaptive Selective Cuckoo Search Algorithm (ASCSA) [24] have been applied to solve the problem of hydrothermal scheduling. Almost all of the above-mentioned methods are mainly meta-heuristic algorithms, excluding GSA and NRM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSOA is demonstrated to be stronger than GA, EP, and Differential Evolution (DE) for this problem. CSA variants [20][21][22][23][24] are developed for the problem and reached better results. Different distributions are tested to find the most appropriate one as compared to original distribution, which is Lévy distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation