2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12562-018-1277-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective microinjection method for genome editing of marine aquaculture fish: tiger pufferfish Takifugu rubripes and red sea bream Pagrus major

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both before and during injecting, pots containing egg clutches were broken apart into multiple shards (~2.0x4.0 cm) using a hammer and chisel. The shards were then placed in a petri dish and partially submerged in Yamamoto’s ringer’s solution [ 47 ] (see Supporting Information S3 File ) to alleviate osmotic stress associated with injection [ 10 ]. Eggs were viewed under a dissection microscope (3.5x magnification) and microinjected directly into the animal pole ( Fig 1A and 1B ) at a 45° angle with a pulled borosilicate glass pipette (Harvard Apparatus: 1.0x0.58x100 mm) fitted on a pneumatic injector unit (Narishige IM- 400) and micromanipulator (Marzhauser MM3301R).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both before and during injecting, pots containing egg clutches were broken apart into multiple shards (~2.0x4.0 cm) using a hammer and chisel. The shards were then placed in a petri dish and partially submerged in Yamamoto’s ringer’s solution [ 47 ] (see Supporting Information S3 File ) to alleviate osmotic stress associated with injection [ 10 ]. Eggs were viewed under a dissection microscope (3.5x magnification) and microinjected directly into the animal pole ( Fig 1A and 1B ) at a 45° angle with a pulled borosilicate glass pipette (Harvard Apparatus: 1.0x0.58x100 mm) fitted on a pneumatic injector unit (Narishige IM- 400) and micromanipulator (Marzhauser MM3301R).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The injection of sgRNA fused with Cas9 protein has proven to be an effective tool for precise genome editing at target gene sequences in the cell lines of numerous species including many teleost fishes such as zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) [ 2 ], Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) [ 3 , 4 ], medaka ( Oryzias latipes ) [ 5 ], Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) [ 6 ], killifish (spp.) [ 7 , 8 ], pufferfish ( Takifugu rubribes ) [ 9 , 10 ], and red sea bream ( Pagrus major ) [ 11 ]. However, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has yet to be applied to coral reef fishes, a highly diverse assemblage of species with a unique life history and biological adaptations suited for survival in their reef environment (e.g., a pelagic larval stage, demersal spawning, and parental behaviour) [ 12 14 ] but make them incompatible with standard CRISPR protocols used on most teleosts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,28 In over 20 aquaculture species, CRISPR/Cas9 system has been used in studies on gene functions and breeding (Table 1). These species include Nile tilapia (O. niloticus), 23,79 Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), 26,80,81 Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus), 25 oriental prawn (Exopalaemon carinicauda), 82 Labeo rohita, a farmed carp (known as rohu), 83 common carp (Cyprinus carpio), 76,84 The Burton's mouth-brooder (Astatotilapia burtoni), 61 Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis), 85 Red sea bream (Pagrus major), [86][87][88] channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), [89][90][91] grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), 92 sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus), 93 olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus), 27,94,95 Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas), 96 blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala), 97 white prawn (Exopalaemon carinicauda), 82 fighting fish (Betta 98 and other species. 12 Studies on genome editing in aquaculture species confirmed that the CRISPR/Cas system is highly efficient, has lower off-target tendencies, and is able to generate long fragment deletions.…”
Section: S Tatus Of G Enome Ed Iting In Aq Uacu Ltu Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further application of CRISPR/Cas in other fish species of commercial importance (for foods and ornamental value) include editing of disease resistance genes in grass carp (Ctenopharyngdon idella ) (Ma et al 2018 ), farmed carp (Chakrapani et al 2016 ), and channel catfish (Elaswad and Dunham 2017 ; Elaswad et al 2018a , b ). Editing of growth-related genes has been conducted in common carp (Zhong et al 2016 ), channel catfish (Khalil et al 2017 ), tiger puffer fish ( Takifugu rubripes ), red sea bream ( Pagrus major ) (Kishimoto et al 2018 , 2019 ) and in olive flounder ( Paralichthys olivaceus ) (eg. Kim et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%