1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.472045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective fragment method for modeling solvent effects in quantum mechanical calculations

Abstract: An effective fragment model is developed to treat solvent effects on chemical properties andreactions. The solvent, which might consist of discrete water molecules, protein, or othermaterial, is treated explicitly using a model potential that incorporates electrostatics,polarization, and exchange repulsion effects. The solute, which one can most generally envision as including some number of solvent molecules as well, is treated in a fully ab initio manner, using an appropriate level of electronic structure th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
404
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 590 publications
(404 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
404
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even considering a single static configuration, our results cannot be considered as quantitative ones because our methodological approach does not include inter-fragment polarization effects (only a local correction is introduced by the OME reassociation method in the important peptide junction region). A methodology that incorporates inter-fragment polarization effects 69,[81][82][83] and a correction for the charge penetration effect 84 is under development. These improvements are especially important to avoid significant errors when evaluating the internal ion pair energy and also when evaluating the ion pair interaction with the surrounding protein residues and water molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even considering a single static configuration, our results cannot be considered as quantitative ones because our methodological approach does not include inter-fragment polarization effects (only a local correction is introduced by the OME reassociation method in the important peptide junction region). A methodology that incorporates inter-fragment polarization effects 69,[81][82][83] and a correction for the charge penetration effect 84 is under development. These improvements are especially important to avoid significant errors when evaluating the internal ion pair energy and also when evaluating the ion pair interaction with the surrounding protein residues and water molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EFP method is a first-principles-based model that was originally designed to describe aqueous environments [306,307]. It was later extended to general solvents and biological environments [263,308,309].…”
Section: Qm/mm and Fragment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most popular MM force fields, like CHARMM [18] or OPLS-AA [17,19,20,22,24,25], have developed extensive sets of atomic-centered partial point charges for calculating electrostatic interactions at the MM level, it is usually convenient to represent the SS atoms by atomic-centered partial point charges in the effective QM Hamiltonian. However, more complicated representations involving distributed multipoles have also been attempted [46,89]. The bonded (stretching, bending, and torsional) interactions and non-bonded van der Waals interactions between the PS and SS are retained at the MM level.…”
Section: Interactions Between the Primary And Secondary Subsystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the boundary between PS and SS does not go through a covalent bound, e.g., a molecule being solvated in water, where the solute is the PS and the solvent (water) molecules are the SS [36,69]. The effective fragment potential method [46] can also be considered as a special case of MM in this catalog. In many cases, however, one cannot avoid passing the boundary between the PS and SS through covalent bonds (e.g., in enzymes or reactive polymers) or through ionic bonds (in solid-state catalysts).…”
Section: Qm/mm Boundary Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%