2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.17.20069823
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ecological study of socioeconomic predictors in detection of COVID-19 cases across neighborhoods in New York City

Abstract: Background:New York City was the first major urban center of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. Cases are clustered in the city, with certain neighborhoods experiencing more cases than others. We investigate whether potential socioeconomic factors can explain between-neighborhood variation in the number of detected COVID-19 cases.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a notable difference between respiratory cases and deaths, which may suggest that the profile of individuals who have the economic or social capital to seek care early for respiratory symptoms in Tijuana differs from those who do not interact with the medical system until after their death. This finding adds to a growing body of literature and social commentary suggesting that social inequalities may be translating into inequalities in the risk of infection or death from COVID-19 in numerous contexts [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Conclusions EMS data provide a valuable tool to rapidly track the health of populations at risk of COVID-19 in LMICs, where other forms of real-time data may not be available. EMS information can be used to track excess out-of-hospital mortality and respiratory burden, as well as changing clinical or demographic features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…There is a notable difference between respiratory cases and deaths, which may suggest that the profile of individuals who have the economic or social capital to seek care early for respiratory symptoms in Tijuana differs from those who do not interact with the medical system until after their death. This finding adds to a growing body of literature and social commentary suggesting that social inequalities may be translating into inequalities in the risk of infection or death from COVID-19 in numerous contexts [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Conclusions EMS data provide a valuable tool to rapidly track the health of populations at risk of COVID-19 in LMICs, where other forms of real-time data may not be available. EMS information can be used to track excess out-of-hospital mortality and respiratory burden, as well as changing clinical or demographic features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…US data indicates that, for example, in Chicago approximately 70% of the deaths were from ethnic minorities [20]. Detailed data from New York showed that the number of COVID-19 cases associated with the percentage of dependents in the local population, the male:female ratio, and low-income neighborhoods [21]. United States-wide data gave a similar result, with proportion of residents >65 years old, ethnic minorities, male:females ratio, and the overall population density associating with increased frequency of COVID-19 [22].…”
Section: The Role Of Current Ses In Covid-19 Morbidity and Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recent onset of the current COVID-19 pandemic, there is already growing evidence about both individual risk factors and population-level drivers of disease and mortality. This study adds to the number of very recent similar spatial analyses of ZCTA-level testing data released by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygeiene, [22][23][24] and illustrates the importance of sharing these kinds of data, as well as the informative nature of spatial epidemiology as the pandemic evolves across the nation and the world. Consistent with prior reports, we find that the clustering of positive COVID-19 testing results in NYC are unlikely to be due to chance, 9,23 and is driven in large measure by socioeconomics, age distribution, 24 and race.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This study adds to the number of very recent similar spatial analyses of ZCTA-level testing data released by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygeiene, [22][23][24] and illustrates the importance of sharing these kinds of data, as well as the informative nature of spatial epidemiology as the pandemic evolves across the nation and the world. Consistent with prior reports, we find that the clustering of positive COVID-19 testing results in NYC are unlikely to be due to chance, 9,23 and is driven in large measure by socioeconomics, age distribution, 24 and race. 9,23 Our study adds to this by demonstrating that the proportion of residents self-identifying as Black/African American is among the single strongest unadjusted bivariate predictors of the proportion of positive tests in a community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%