“…Multiracial literature further explicates how these same folk theories of race combine to inform unique social narratives related to multiraciality (Dalmage, 2004;Ifekwunigwe, 2004;Keddell, 2009;rockquemore & Laszloffy, 2003rockquemore & Laszloffy, , 2005. These constructions of multiraciality include the following: narratives within society and science that pathologize multiracial individuals as inherently at risk for cultural loss, identity confusion, and psychological problems caused genetically by mixed racial heritage, as typified by the figures of the "tragic mulatto" and the "marginal man"; social conceptions of interracial partnerships as unnatural and, thus, inherently ill fated; constructions of the "multiracial identity" as an unresolved and unhealthy identity status; narratives within communities of color that pathologize claims to multiracial identities as attempts to "pass" as white and escape racial stigma; and today's portrayal of multiracials as "rainbow children"-experiencing the "best of both worlds" or validating a "postrace" America (see Chiong, 1998;Coleman et al, 2003;Dalmage, 2004;Davis, 2001;Gaskins, 1999;Guevarra, 2007;Ifekwunigwe, 2004;rockquemore & Laszloffy, 2003rockquemore & Laszloffy, , 2005root & Kelley, 2003;Samuels, 2006;Shih & Sanchez, 2005;Spencer, 2006;wijeyesinghe, 2001). Therefore, developing critical self-awareness requires an understanding of how these societal narratives of race inform our own beliefs about multiracial individuals and families.…”