An e-learning environment embedded with sign language videos: research into its usability and the academic performance and learning patterns of deaf students

Hashim, Mohd.; Tasir, Zaidatun

doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09802-4

Cited by 19 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The benefits of the e-learning as a mechanism to improve learning performance of campus-based students (Azlan et al, 2020). In addition, it provides an interesting and meaningful experience for students because of their abilities can be integrated directly, so that understanding of the learning material will be more meaningful, easy to understand, easy to remember and easy to express again (Hashim, & Tasir, 2020). The impact and benefits of e-learning improve one's level of understanding and memory on the knowledge conveyed, because of the varied content, interesting interactions (Al-International Journal of Instruction, October 2022• Vol.15, No.4 Adwan et al, 2021.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lack E-Learning Effectiveness: An Analysis Evaluating E-Learning in Engineering Education

Rizal¹,

Hidayat²,

Jaya³

et al. 2022

INT J INSTRUCTION

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The evaluation should be performed to ensure the effectiveness, efficiency, and positive impact of the learning process for students. Therefore, the objectives of the research are to evaluate the application of e-learning towards the benefits, satisfaction, and impact on students in engineering education. This study employed the quantitative approach in which samples of 504 engineering education students as the study using a saturated sampling method. Furthermore, data were collected through a questionnaire using a Likert scale, and structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis techniques were applied to test the measurement model of the research questions. The results showed that the Context, Input, and Process components of E-learning were categorized in a very good category, while the Product component was included in a good category. The findings are supported by empirical data, with a statistical T value > 1.96 and a P-value < 0.05. Furthermore, the effects of e-learning towards the benefits, satisfaction, and impacts are all positively significant directly and indirectly. In summary, it can be said that e-learning can be an effective educational tool to support students in the learning process as well as a means of communication between students and lecturers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lack E-Learning Effectiveness: An Analysis Evaluating E-Learning in Engineering Education

Rizal¹,

Hidayat²,

Jaya³

et al. 2022

INT J INSTRUCTION

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(3) Even score = 5 -∑Px (4) for the adjusted value for odd-even questions, and P is equal to the value of the question. Then the results of each question are added up and divided by 2.5.…”

Section: Maticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on testing using the time-based efficiency formula of 32 respondents and 27 task scenarios on the efficiency level, the result is 80.05%. After recapitulating the data from the SUS questionnaire above, then the calculations are carried out according to the formula for calculating the SUS questionnaire, namely, for each question with an odd number (1,3,5,7,9) the score given by the respondent is reduced by 1, and for each question with an odd number even number (2,4,6,8,10) the score given by the respondent is used to subtract 5. Next, the results of each question from each respondent are added up and then divided by 2.5 (∑odd score+∑even score) x 2.5.…”

Section: Testing Aspects Of Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fardan Zamakhsyari Author is with Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia, email H76217056@uinsby.ac.id) Achmad Teguh Wibowo Author is with Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia, email atw@uinsby.ac.id) Mohammad Khusnu Milad Author is with Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia, email m.milad@uinsby.ac.id) Learning media a developed by several processes, including observation, planning, and student requirement, which are used as an appropriate learning design [3]. The impact of learning media on the interaction process of students and teachers in the studying process is similar to tools for social interaction in education [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Enhance User Interface to Deaf E-Learning Based on User Centered Design

Zamakhsyari

Wibowo

Milad

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract—The cognitive learning approach through visual media is a characteristic of learning for deaf students because these students can receive learning more quickly. However, this method became an obstacle when this process was online conducted because of the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on the explanation, a need for media learning based on interactive media can help students in the studying process. This research focuses on developing learning media using User Center Design (UCD) method to a center for the development system. In this research, we develop a user interface (UI) for deaf students, especially in the Putra Asih inclusive school in the city of Kediri, Indonesia. The evaluation of this research using ISO-9241 shows the effectiveness of using the application obtained 87,15%, effectiveness of the user interface design obtained 80,05%, and user satisfaction obtained 71,18% where all parameters make sense and acceptable based on a response from the users.

show abstract

“…In shaping appropriate digital environments and settings, the works of Hashim and Tasir (2020), analyzing educational environments in the case of digital learning through the use of sign language videos, analyzing studies about usability, learning patterns and academic performance, are using a mixed-method design system, through the use of questionnaires, activities, performance tests and learning recording data in conjunction with interviews.…”

Section: Suitable Digital Environmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sign language teaching technological advances and differences in international contexts

Prado

2021

IJILT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe main objective of this article is to contribute to the field of accessibility in the teaching of sign language in the international panorama, examining its applicability, evaluation methods as well as the assistive technologies used to improve teaching experiences and the creation of new materials, proposing a theoretical framework that relates the teaching of sign language at different academic levels, the training of teachers, as well as parents, and the use of technology to achieve educational inclusion. It follows that the adoption of hybrid technology approaches, following universal design principles, can help to integrate access to education and sign language literacy.Design/methodology/approachThe working method used to carry out this work consists of a systematic review of the scientific literature. This is a research project based on the recapitulation of information about sign language in the international panorama and the improvements used for its instruction. For this purpose, the well-known PRISMA (Moher et al., 2009) is used to synthesize the search carried out. A systematic review of the articles published in scientific journals about pedagogy in the teaching of sign language in the international field and technological innovation for sign language teaching has been carried out, incorporating different approaches and personal assessments. The first phase of the method consists of identifying and analyzing the articles published in scientific journals on the teaching of sign language on the international scene and the importance of new educational models with the incorporation of various didactic adaptations, evaluating the selected articles over a period of time from 2009 to 2021. Six steps were used in the systematic review study (Figure 1). First, Steps 1–4 were conducted in 2020 and 2021 as part of a doctoral research. A schematic summary of Steps 1–4 is presented below, followed by Steps 5 and 6, added later to the study after completion of Step 4. In the case of the first four steps they were conducted by two researchers: the thesis tutor and the doctoral student, and Steps 5 and 6 were conducted by the Ph.FindingsTo carry out the analysis of the results, the codification of the variables was carried out. The selected studies are characterized by their international context with a final selection of 39 studies have found several variables that affect the relationship between the teaching of sign language in the international arena and the use of technological innovations to adapt their teaching to students (Figure 4). In this section we present the technology grouped variables included in each factor and the possibilities of standardization and applicability of sign language teaching in the international panorama. Within these articles, the importance of defining training programs in sign language for teachers and the need to evaluate teaching programs is identified, with a focus on actions to improve school curricula to achieve linguistic standardization and inclusion in the academic environment, as well as their use at all levels of education. Therefore, professional practices and cooperation between institutions such as: associations of families of deaf students and educational institutions must be improved, making it possible to give a quality education. Within the exclusion criteria, the articles that do not use sign language teaching tools (n = 45) were subsequently discarded, followed by the articles that do not indicate any intervention in students with disabilities (n = 48), concluding with the articles that nonsign language disability education (n = 44). Subsequently, among those selected, the technology articles that do not speak about sign language were discarded (n = 32), as well as the studies that protect indigenous language but not sign language (n = 33) and, to conclude, the linguistic normalization articles but do not cite sign language (n = 37).Originality/valueCommunication is the element by which the authors can understand each other with the rest of the people around us, in the diversity of language, within non-verbal language, the authors find sign language, the language of deaf and mute people, of families, as a professional employee and nowadays, learned by many non-deaf and mute people to achieve a more inclusive and integrated society with all people. Every country has the right to have its own sign language, especially one that claims its culture and customs, through non-verbal communication with which to express multiple meanings, emotions and intentions. It is essential to know and apply the technological advances that are being developed, promoting the right to autonomy and the defense of the indigenous language as a cultural element of the intangible heritage of each country. The use of technology allows the democratization of culture and access to information regardless of where one lives in the world, in an increasingly globalized society in which communication plays a fundamental role. In the case of the global pandemic, it has forced us to the advancement of home education and the use of efficient digital tools to achieve it such as videoconferencing, in the field of disability there are still many limitations on this use by the various companies that develop them. Within the inclusive educational research the authors must emphasize the need for equality of tools and content for all types of students, especially in sign language. Large digital gaps have been generated in families with and without resources at international level, which also have a member with a disability, this is pointed out in the research mentioning the current situation of the American continent, as well as the search for improvement of the tools and platforms in which they are developed.

show abstract

An e-learning environment embedded with sign language videos: research into its usability and the academic performance and learning patterns of deaf students

Cited by 19 publications

References 57 publications

Lack E-Learning Effectiveness: An Analysis Evaluating E-Learning in Engineering Education

Lack E-Learning Effectiveness: An Analysis Evaluating E-Learning in Engineering Education

Enhance User Interface to Deaf E-Learning Based on User Centered Design

Sign language teaching technological advances and differences in international contexts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About