2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An azole-resistant isolate of Malassezia pachydermatis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
47
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Control cultures were achieved with medium alone, and with medium supplemen- ted with 50% of sweet almond oil, respectively. Furthermore, the yeasts were tested against ketoconazole by E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), as described by Nijima et al, (2010) [16]. Cultures were incubated at 30 °C for 24-72 h, until a full development of the yeasts in control wells was noticeable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control cultures were achieved with medium alone, and with medium supplemen- ted with 50% of sweet almond oil, respectively. Furthermore, the yeasts were tested against ketoconazole by E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), as described by Nijima et al, (2010) [16]. Cultures were incubated at 30 °C for 24-72 h, until a full development of the yeasts in control wells was noticeable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we reported that a clinical isolate of M. pachydermatis was resistant to itraconazole [9]. Cafarchia et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of alternative procedures, most of which use lipid-enriched media, have been proposed, but published studies have mainly focused on M. pachydermatis susceptibility to ketoconazole, itraconazole, and other azole derivatives (e.g., [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. On the contrary, information on the in vitro susceptibility of M. pachydermatis isolates to the polyene amphotericin B, which is commonly used for treating bloodstream infections in human patients (5-7), is scarcer; the available studies were based on a single method and/or a low number of isolates (see Table 1), so the reliability of their results cannot be adequately assessed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%