2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic splitting method for the adhesive piglets’ gray scale image based on the ellipse shape feature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the background removal, the target regions were identified to obtain interlacing canopies. Methods such as contour features, bump detection, and contour stripping [35,36] could not be used to identify interlacing tree canopies because the trees do not have regular shape. Figure 4 shows that intermingled trees would occupy more area on their respective rows than single trees.…”
Section: Interlacing Canopy Region Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the background removal, the target regions were identified to obtain interlacing canopies. Methods such as contour features, bump detection, and contour stripping [35,36] could not be used to identify interlacing tree canopies because the trees do not have regular shape. Figure 4 shows that intermingled trees would occupy more area on their respective rows than single trees.…”
Section: Interlacing Canopy Region Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods can separate animals that are close together, but cannot be used for accurate extraction of animal foreground as the contour of the animal is either rough and incomplete or of a specific shape (e.g. the Otsu-based background subtraction proposed by Nasirahmadi et al (2015) and the method of merging fitted ellipses proposed by Lu et al (2016)). Thus, more work is required on this challenge.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…presented by commercial farms. Table 1 summarizes the topview-based pig monitoring results introduced recently [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. Two-dimensional gray-scale or color information has been used to detect a single pig in a pen or a specially built facility (i.e., in “constrained” environments) [ 9 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional gray-scale or color information has been used to detect a single pig in a pen or a specially built facility (i.e., in “constrained” environments) [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. However, even with advanced techniques applied to 2D gray-scale or color information, it remains challenging to detect multiple pigs accurately in a “commercial” farm environment [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. For example, images from a gray-scale or RGB camera are affected by various illuminations in a pig pen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%