2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10732-020-09439-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic constructive matheuristic for the shift minimization personnel task scheduling problem

Abstract: The shift minimization personnel task scheduling problem is an NP-complete optimization problem that concerns the assignment of tasks to multi-skilled employees with a view to minimize the total number of assigned employees. Recent literature indicates that hybrid methods which combine exact and heuristic techniques such as matheuristics are efficient as regards to generating high quality solutions. The present work employs a constructive matheuristic (CMH): a decomposition-based method where sub-problems are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e five other methods use commercial MILP solvers as part of the solution process: S14 [19], FL13 [14], B15 [15], R18 [17], and C20 [18]. Table 5 shows the detailed results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…e five other methods use commercial MILP solvers as part of the solution process: S14 [19], FL13 [14], B15 [15], R18 [17], and C20 [18]. Table 5 shows the detailed results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chirayil Chandrasekharan et al [18] noted that FL instances were unavailable when S14 method was published and that a summary of the S14 results was obtained upon request. e authors provided us the instance-specific results of the S14 method for FL instances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of shifts denotes the known optimum value for the SMPTSP, i.e. the minimum number of shifts derived from the recent paper by Chandrasekharan et al [21]. The @AVG measure indicates the estimated average number of tasks per non-empty shift, i.e.…”
Section: Benchmark Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%