Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Intelligence 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3135954.3135967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An automatic annotation method for early esophageal cancers based on saliency guided superpixel segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of Scores$Scor{e}_s$ is obtained as 0.63 for this phase. The best results of EAC annotation in [33, 34] are achieved for large EAC regions. According to the results, the dice, recall, and precision values are 0.77, 0.75, and 0.77, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The value of Scores$Scor{e}_s$ is obtained as 0.63 for this phase. The best results of EAC annotation in [33, 34] are achieved for large EAC regions. According to the results, the dice, recall, and precision values are 0.77, 0.75, and 0.77, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BE and EAC regions are more recognizable than the regions that suffer from early-stage Barrett (our case) due to their tissue deformation and/or colour changes. Therefore, the methods presented in [28][29][30][31][33][34][35][36] could not help annotate the Z-line in our dataset. Along with this reason, the deep learning-based methods provided in [13,18,32] cannot be suitable due to the difference in the quality of the images.…”
Section: Figure 10mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations