2022
DOI: 10.18421/tem114-34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Automated Essay Scoring Based on Neural Networks to Predict and Classify Competence of Examinees in Community Academy

Abstract: AES has been widely used in assessing student learning outcomes. However, few studies use Automated Essay Scoring (AES) to simultaneously determine the community academy's competency test scores and levels. This study aims to apply AES to assess essays on the competency certification test. The AES can predict the examinees' scores and classify examinees' competency levels. The method used to build AES uses Back Propagation Neural Networks (BPNN). BPNN was chosen because of its simplicity and ease in building t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing the results of the assessment tests on essay questions between automation and human raters, the problem frame can be seen whether there are significant differences, as the human rater can be labor-intensive and time-consuming (Zhang, 2013), whereas automation process brings otherwise results (Dong et al, 2017;Wong & Bong, 2019). By using the AES, statistical proof of the automation assessment results at the validity and reliability level becomes a benchmark, whether the consistency of the results supports the resulting accuracy value, or it still requires other proof from the human rater; the prediction results show the same/not much difference (Buditjahjanto et al, 2022). This phenomenon is still a topic of conversation in vocational education regarding the quality of outcomes of students at Akademi Komunitas Negeri (AKN) Pacitan and Blitar (research locus), because currently the competency test assessment still uses a human rater, and has an impact on recognizing ownership of a competency certificate as a competency in mastering knowledge, skills, and attitudes (Watkins, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the results of the assessment tests on essay questions between automation and human raters, the problem frame can be seen whether there are significant differences, as the human rater can be labor-intensive and time-consuming (Zhang, 2013), whereas automation process brings otherwise results (Dong et al, 2017;Wong & Bong, 2019). By using the AES, statistical proof of the automation assessment results at the validity and reliability level becomes a benchmark, whether the consistency of the results supports the resulting accuracy value, or it still requires other proof from the human rater; the prediction results show the same/not much difference (Buditjahjanto et al, 2022). This phenomenon is still a topic of conversation in vocational education regarding the quality of outcomes of students at Akademi Komunitas Negeri (AKN) Pacitan and Blitar (research locus), because currently the competency test assessment still uses a human rater, and has an impact on recognizing ownership of a competency certificate as a competency in mastering knowledge, skills, and attitudes (Watkins, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%