2015
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.423.5778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An audit of request forms submitted in a multidisciplinary diagnostic center in Lagos

Abstract: IntroductionRequest forms are important means of communication between physicians and diagnostic service providers. Pre-analytical errors account for over two thirds of errors encountered in diagnostic service provision. The importance of adequate completion of request forms is usually underestimated by physicians which may result in medical errors or delay in instituting appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to audit the level of completion of request forms presented at a multidisciplinary diagnost… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
5
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
18
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were only 1.0% (3/289) of the evaluated request forms with all the required information and the rest had one or more of the parameters missing. This result is similar to the finding by Oyedeji et al [9] and Oyelekan et al [10] [12] reported a similar finding. The time of collection of the specimen was indicated in 84.1% of the forms and this was higher than the findings reported in studies by Adekoge et al [13], Makubi et al [8], Oyelekan et al [10] and Olayemi & Asiamah-Broni [11] where the parameter was recorded in 10.3%, 1.5%, 0.7% and 0.0% of the request forms respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There were only 1.0% (3/289) of the evaluated request forms with all the required information and the rest had one or more of the parameters missing. This result is similar to the finding by Oyedeji et al [9] and Oyelekan et al [10] [12] reported a similar finding. The time of collection of the specimen was indicated in 84.1% of the forms and this was higher than the findings reported in studies by Adekoge et al [13], Makubi et al [8], Oyelekan et al [10] and Olayemi & Asiamah-Broni [11] where the parameter was recorded in 10.3%, 1.5%, 0.7% and 0.0% of the request forms respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…20 Our findings are higher than the Lagos, Nigeria study, which reported 68% completion for patient age, 21 as well as the much lower completion reported for patient age (25.6%) and sex (32.7%) in a Ghanaian study. 13 Both our report and the Ile-Ife study 20 found that the only well-completed parameter on the LRFs was patient information.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Les renseignements cliniques et thérapeutiques étaient absents sur 59,4% des BAB de cette étude. Ces résultats étaient en accord avec ceux observés dans d'autres pays d'Afrique et d'Asie (Olayemi et Asiamah-Broni, 2011;Oyedeji et al, 2015 ;Toshniwal et al, 2017). La mention des renseignements cliniques et thérapeutiques peut aider le biologiste dans le choix de la technique à utiliser ou l'amener à déconseiller une investigation coûteuse pour en suggérer une autre plus adéquate.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified