2023
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acb96e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An attention-based deep learning approach for the classification of subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment using resting-state EEG

Abstract: Objective. This study aims to design and implement the first Deep Learning (DL) model to classify subjects in the prodromic states of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) based on resting-state electroencephalographic signals. Approach. EEG recordings of 17 Healthy Controls (HC), 56 Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) and 45 Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) subjects were acquired at resting state. After preprocessing, we selected sections corresponding to eyes-closed condition. Five different datasets were created by extrac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the AUC of the classifier with the best performance was 0.86. Previous studies reported highest AUC values ranging between from 0.80 to 0.89 in classifying AD vs. controls (Babiloni et al, 2016; Chai et al, 2019; Chedid et al, 2022; de Haan et al, 2008; Ding et al, 2022; Fernández et al, 2006; Meghdadi et al, 2021; Trambaiolli et al, 2011), and between 0.60 and 0.81 in classifying MCI vs. controls (Ding et al, 2022; Gómez et al, 2009; Meghdadi et al, 2021; Sibilano et al, 2023). Considering that those studies investigated disease stages of AD with apparent cognitive impairments, our model achieved similar classification performance in a preclinical phase of AD with normal cognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the current study, the AUC of the classifier with the best performance was 0.86. Previous studies reported highest AUC values ranging between from 0.80 to 0.89 in classifying AD vs. controls (Babiloni et al, 2016; Chai et al, 2019; Chedid et al, 2022; de Haan et al, 2008; Ding et al, 2022; Fernández et al, 2006; Meghdadi et al, 2021; Trambaiolli et al, 2011), and between 0.60 and 0.81 in classifying MCI vs. controls (Ding et al, 2022; Gómez et al, 2009; Meghdadi et al, 2021; Sibilano et al, 2023). Considering that those studies investigated disease stages of AD with apparent cognitive impairments, our model achieved similar classification performance in a preclinical phase of AD with normal cognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, EEG features collected during cognitive tasks are likely to be more informative than those acquired at rest and hence lead to a more efficient classification of EEG synchronization in MCI and AD 56 . A potential alternative approach is the automatic learning of features based on deep learning tools 57 . Novel approaches can improve not only classification with EEG features, but also improve the design of personalized models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 A potential alternative approach is the automatic learning of features based on deep learning tools. 57 Novel approaches can improve not only classification with EEG features, but also improve the design of personalized models. Previous works utilized models personalized with structural scans, such as, 19 to derive novel features to support the classification of AD and MCI patients.…”
Section: Classification Of MCI With Eeg Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, EEG features collected during cognitive tasks are likely to be more informative than those acquired at rest and hence lead to a more efficient classification EEG synchronization in MCI and AD (56). A potential alternative approach is automatic learning of features based on deep learning tools [57]. Novel approaches can improve not only classification with EEG features, but also improve the design personalized models.…”
Section: Classification Of MCI With Eeg Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%