An Assessment of the Quality of Life of Patients With Class III Deformities Treated With Orthognathic Surgery

Kılınç, Adnan; Ertaş, Ümit

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.019

Cited by 28 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Orthognathic surgery is a reliable approach for treatment of dentomaxillofacial deformities. It is performed aiming to improve esthetics, function, facial appearance, mastication and speech [4]. Aside from these advantages, orthognathic surgery has complications as well such as neurovascular problems, bleeding, infection, incorrect osteotomy and its consequences, traumatization of teeth, impaired bone healing, unbalanced occlusion, temporomandibular joint problems and consequently unfavorable esthetics [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral health related quality of life of patients with class III skeletal malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundOrthognathic surgery includes improvement of morphology and function of occlusion as well as psychological perception and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the OHRQoL of patients with class III skeletal malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery.Materials and methodsA total of 112 skeletal class III patients including 39 (34.8%) males and 73 (65.2%) females participated in this descriptive quasi-experimental study in three groups: “prior to orthodontic treatment” (n = 25); “under orthodontic treatment and prior to surgery” (n = 65), and “after surgery” (n = 25). All patients filled out a demographic information questionnaire, the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14), and the orthognathic quality of life questionnaire (OQLQ) under the supervision of the examiner. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, independent samples t-test, Mann Whitney test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.ResultsOHRQoL summary score changed from 14.5 prior to orthodontic treatment to 23.4 prior to surgery and during orthodontic treatment to 5.4 after surgery. These OHRQoL changes were statistically significant (P < 0.001).ConclusionsOrthognathic surgery matters to patients with class III skeletal malocclusion and significantly improves their OHRQoL.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral health related quality of life of patients with class III skeletal malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is recognized that facial changes markedly change the patients' facial appearance and can change the life of an individual in various ways. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The results obtained in this study showed improvements in the quality of life of patients after orthognathic surgery, as well as improvements related to psychosocial factors. In fact, the SF-36 results showed an improvement in several parameters in both groups, with a predominance in the surgery-first cohort.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…For each subscale, the answers to the questions are scored from 0, indicating the worst possible quality of life, to 100, indicating the best possible quality of life. 9,18 The RSA is a 33-item self-report scale measuring resilience protective factors among adults. The RSA evaluates intrapersonal as well as interpersonal and family aspects of resilience.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Currently, little and contradictory information is available regarding the impact of the surgery-first approach and traditional approach on patients' psychological status and quality-of-life outcomes. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Therefore, the aims of this study were to assess the personality traits of orthognathic patients and to investigate and compare the changes related to psychosocial well-being, self-esteem, anxiety, and quality of life between presurgical and postsurgical phases in patients undergoing traditional and surgery-first orthognathic treatments.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychodynamic Features Associated With Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparison Between Conventional Orthognathic Treatment and “Surgery-First” Approach

Brucoli

Zeppegno

Benech

et al. 2019

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It was indicated a smaller score of OHIP-14 in SFA group than that in CTM group at 1 month after bonding [38]. This result can be owing to the fact that the patients in SFA group had finished the surgery and had facial profile improved immediately at this time-point, and SFA made the patients achieve similar degree of satisfaction and dentofacial harmony to those with normal skeletal relationship [47]. At the same time-point, the patients in CTM group were just at the beginning of presurgical orthodontics and had worse facial deformity as a result of dental decompensation by CTM.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of surgery-first approach on the oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is affected by dentofacial deformity. Patients with dentofacial deformity are normally treated with orthognathic surgery, including conventional three-stage method (CTM) and surgery first approach (SFA). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the impact of SFA with CTM on the OHRQoL of patients with severe dentofacial deformity. Methods Five English databases, three Chinese databases, and six grey literature databases were searched (January 2000 to July 2018). Randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and cohort studies assessing the OHRQoL of patients who underwent SFA or CTM were included. After selecting studies, extracting data, and assessing risk-of-bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, meta-analysis was performed to elucidate the effects of SFA on the changes of OHRQoL of patients with dentofacial deformity at each stage and made a comparison with CTM. Results There were 4 studies with 122 participants were selected for the final analysis. Three among these studies were included in meta-analysis, 2 of which were included in each forest plot. All the included studies were graded as moderate value of evidence according to GRADE quality analysis. Over the period of 2-year follow-up after bonding, the OHRQoL of the patients in SFA group showed an improving trend and was better than those in CTM group generally. After debonding, the summary scores of the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) (− 2.92, P = 0.12) and Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) (− 5.59, P = 0.01) were smaller in SFA group than CTM group. Conclusions Clinical evidence indicates that SFA can contribute to the better OHRQoL in patients with dentofacial deformity immediately and persistently.

show abstract

An Assessment of the Quality of Life of Patients With Class III Deformities Treated With Orthognathic Surgery

Cited by 28 publications

References 16 publications

Oral health related quality of life of patients with class III skeletal malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery

Oral health related quality of life of patients with class III skeletal malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery

Psychodynamic Features Associated With Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparison Between Conventional Orthognathic Treatment and “Surgery-First” Approach

The impact of surgery-first approach on the oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About