Oral health related quality of life of patients with class III skeletal malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery

Rezaei, Farzad; Masalehi, Hiwa; Golshah, Amin; Imani, Mohammad Moslem

doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0989-9

Cited by 22 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The authors found that during the decompensation phase of orthodontic treatment, the patients' quality of life had significantly decreased, whereas after the surgical orthodontic treatment, it had been significantly improved. The same observations presented Rezaei et al [30].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…Unlike, the authors found that there were no statistically significant differences regarding the OHIP-14 values before and after orthodontic treatment. However, most of the authors, who compared the OHIP-14 values before and after orthodontic treatment, found that the patients' quality of life had significantly improved after orthodontic treatment [27][28][29][30]. Moreover, Zheng et al [31] found that the positive impact of orthodontic treatment on the patients' quality of life depends on the type of malocclusion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quality of Life in Orthodontic Cancer Survivor Patients—A Prospective Case–Control Study

Mituś-Kenig

Derwich²,

Czochrowska

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors with a control group of healthy subjects before, during, and after the orthodontic treatment. Methods: Consecutive cancer survivors (40 people) who were looking for orthodontic treatment between 2008 and 2015 were enrolled into the study. Healthy orthodontic patients matched for age (±4 years), sex, and malocclusion served as controls. The 14-item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile was used to assess the effect of orthodontic treatment on QoL before, during, and after the orthodontic treatment. Results: There were no significant differences between both groups regarding the cast model, cephalometric analysis, and photographic documentation analysis. There was a significant worsening of QoL after the onset of the orthodontic treatment with a significant improvement after the treatment. Male cancer survivor patients reported significantly lower QoL during the treatment time, which was not observed in the male control group. Conclusions: The outcome of orthodontic treatment in cancer survivors did not differ from the healthy orthodontic patients. The orthodontic treatment had an impact on the oral health quality of life both in the cancer and the control groups with a significantly higher impact in male cancer survivor patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of Life in Orthodontic Cancer Survivor Patients—A Prospective Case–Control Study

Mituś-Kenig

Derwich²,

Czochrowska

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, orthognathic surgery alone has already shown excellent results in terms of improving overall patient satisfaction. Aiming to assess oral health-related quality of life before and after orthognathic surgery, Rezaei et al [ 7 ] examined 112 adult patients with class III skeletal malocclusion using the Short Form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and Orthognathic Quality of Life (OQLQ) questionnaires. Their results showed that orthognathic surgery improved the quality of life of these patients, as well as their satisfaction, self-confidence, and oral function.…”

Section: Clinical Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The level of patient satisfaction may decrease before surgery due to the lack of knowledge of patients about the phases of orthodontic treatment. Thus, as occurred in the present case, it is up to the multidisciplinary team to raise patient awareness about the therapeutic phases to potentially increase the level of satisfaction with the treatmen [ 7 ].…”

Section: Clinical Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthognathic surgery and orthodontics associated with orofacial harmonization: Case report

Dall’Magro

Dogenski

Dall’Magro

et al. 2021

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction and importance Orthognathic surgery aims to restore the functional and esthetic standards of the face and non-surgical or minimally invasive procedures have been optimizing the results of facial orthosurgical treatments. This case report aimed to show the use of minimally invasive techniques that, associated with orthognathic surgery, represent a trend in current oral and maxillofacial rehabilitation. Case presentation A female patient, 28 years old, white, sought care from the Dentistry team of the São Vicente de Paulo Hospital, in Passo Fundo, Brazil, complaining of mandibular prognathism, anteroposterior maxillary deficiency, dental crowding, malocclusion, functional and esthetic changes that negatively affected her psychosocial interactions and stomatognathic function. The treatment involved orthodontics, orthognathic surgery, and orofacial harmonization with dermal fillers. Clinical discussion The multidisciplinarity among the specialties of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology, Orthodontics, and Orofacial Harmonization add and contribute to the process of planning and implementing the treatment proposed, as well as the prognosis toward patient satisfaction. Conclusion The surgical procedure associated with minimally invasive facial harmonization not only corrected the functional complaint of the patient but also played an important role in improving facial harmony, contributing significantly to self-esteem.

show abstract

“…21 Previous studies considered a concave profile less attractive and an increase in lower third of the face is to be more attractive than decreased facial height. 21,22 Although women will report a greater negative impact on their quality of life from their malocclusion than men, 23,24 sex is not considered to be a decisive factor since differences were observed only among those who accepted surgery: Females have experienced greater difficulties in social interactions and were more aware of their aesthetics than males. This can be explained with females' higher aesthetic standard as they influence a larger role in females' lives.…”

Section: F I G U R E 1 Comparison Of Dimensions Of Quality Of Life Between Ioftn Grades (Whiskers Represent 95% Confidence Intervals)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Facial aesthetic concern is a powerful predictor of patients' decision to accept orthognathic surgery

Perković

Pavlić

Zrinski

et al. 2021

Orthod Craniofacial Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate differences in quality of life in subjects with and without skeletal malocclusions and factors influencing patients' decision to accept orthognathic surgery. Materials and methodsDesign: Cross-sectional with stratified sampling. Settings and sample population: 190 Caucasian subjects (65% females), aged 17-46 years. 95 subjects were consecutive patients referred to University Dental Clinic for skeletal malocclusion treatment of which 58 subjects accepted suggested surgery, 37 refused. The other 95 were age-and sex-matched controls, without malocclusions, recruited from the pool of students and employees of local high schools and university. Main outcome measures: Psychosocial and functional issues were evaluated by Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire. Complexity of malocclusion and treatment need was assessed by the Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need.Results: Discriminant analysis demonstrated that in quality of life, three groups differed mostly in facial aesthetic concern, followed by altered oral function, then by social interactions which were the highest in the group that accepted surgery.When controlling for age, sex, oral function impairment, awareness of facial deformity and inhibitions in social contacts in a multiple logistic regression analysis, only IOFTN and facial aesthetic concern were significant predictors of orthognathic surgery acceptance, increasing the odds for acceptance by 2.9x and 4.7x, respectively (P ≤ .045). Conclusion:Facial aesthetic concern is very important factor in patients' decisionmaking process for accepting orthognathic treatment for skeletal malocclusions, with greater importance than high normative need for functional orthognathic treatment.

show abstract

Oral health related quality of life of patients with class III skeletal malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery

Cited by 22 publications

References 20 publications

Quality of Life in Orthodontic Cancer Survivor Patients—A Prospective Case–Control Study

Quality of Life in Orthodontic Cancer Survivor Patients—A Prospective Case–Control Study

Orthognathic surgery and orthodontics associated with orofacial harmonization: Case report

Facial aesthetic concern is a powerful predictor of patients' decision to accept orthognathic surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About