2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of the OHSAS 18001 certification process: Objective drivers and consequences on safety performance and labour productivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
100
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental objective of the OHSAS 18001 standard is to support and promote good practices in the area of occupational health and safety via systematic and structured management systems (Chang and Liang, 2009). Also, prior studies suggest that safety practices linked to the OHSAS 18001 improve both competences at existing operational procedures and the functioning of the business (Abad et al, 2013;Lo et al, 2014). As a result, adopting organizations could be in a solid position to minimize risks to its employees, and subsequently to reduce work accidents (Fernández-Muñiz et al, 2012).…”
Section: Background Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The fundamental objective of the OHSAS 18001 standard is to support and promote good practices in the area of occupational health and safety via systematic and structured management systems (Chang and Liang, 2009). Also, prior studies suggest that safety practices linked to the OHSAS 18001 improve both competences at existing operational procedures and the functioning of the business (Abad et al, 2013;Lo et al, 2014). As a result, adopting organizations could be in a solid position to minimize risks to its employees, and subsequently to reduce work accidents (Fernández-Muñiz et al, 2012).…”
Section: Background Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the adoption of the OHSAS 18001 can be understood as a reaction to poor safety performance (Abad et al, 2013;Bevilacqua et al, 2016;Lo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Background Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations