2007
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2007.895301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of Testing-Effort Dependent Software Reliability Growth Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early researches related SRGM with respect to testing time [3,17]. However, incorporation of testing resources leads to development of more accurate SRGMs [4,5,9,26]. The reason being, the detection of faults are more intimately linked to the amount of resources expended [18,24] on testing as it includes-(a) Manpower, that takes into account  Testing group (malfunction recognition personnel).…”
Section: 'Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early researches related SRGM with respect to testing time [3,17]. However, incorporation of testing resources leads to development of more accurate SRGMs [4,5,9,26]. The reason being, the detection of faults are more intimately linked to the amount of resources expended [18,24] on testing as it includes-(a) Manpower, that takes into account  Testing group (malfunction recognition personnel).…”
Section: 'Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al [5] worked with logistic resource function. They established that both exponential-type and S-type NHPP models can come under ideal and imperfect debugging situations.…”
Section:  Debugging Group (Programmers\failure Rectification Personnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from applying the proposed models to two real data sets are discussed and compared with other traditional SRGM to show that the proposed models can give better predictions and that the logistic testing-effort function is suitable for incorporating directly into both exponential-type and S-shaped software reliability models. Gaurav Aggarwal et al [9] categorized Software Reliability Model into two types, one is static model and the other one is dynamic model. Dynamic models observed that the temporary behaviour of debugging process during testing phase.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, organizations rely on a variety of SRGMs to accurately analyze the software's reliability [2] and to improve the process of software testing. In spite of their success the SRGMs have their own set of problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%