2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11708-021-0731-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of surrogate fuel using Bayesian multiple kernel learning model in sight of sooting tendency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the results of the 'winner' surrogate are compared with the results achieved by the most distant surrogate comprised in the subset of acceptable solutions in the same pool (objective function F ≥ 0.95 max(F)), which will be called bound surrogate. The comparison is performed in order to discuss the 'unicity' of the surrogate composition that is assessed by means of the parameter called compatibility, which is defined as in Equation (15), where P is the number of components in the initial palette, x i,OPT and x i,B represent the volume fractions of the i-th compound in the optimum surrogate and in the bound surrogate, respectively. Figure 8 reports the results of both the overall and the class-by-class compatibility.…”
Section: Composition Unicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, the results of the 'winner' surrogate are compared with the results achieved by the most distant surrogate comprised in the subset of acceptable solutions in the same pool (objective function F ≥ 0.95 max(F)), which will be called bound surrogate. The comparison is performed in order to discuss the 'unicity' of the surrogate composition that is assessed by means of the parameter called compatibility, which is defined as in Equation (15), where P is the number of components in the initial palette, x i,OPT and x i,B represent the volume fractions of the i-th compound in the optimum surrogate and in the bound surrogate, respectively. Figure 8 reports the results of both the overall and the class-by-class compatibility.…”
Section: Composition Unicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is underlined that the optimum surrogate and the bound surrogate for A, B, D gasolines are fully compatible in ethanol a-priori since the presence of ethanol in those surrogates was constrained at zero by the user, being the real A, B, D gasolines lacking in oxygenates (Table A1). compatibility = 100 − ∑ P i=1 (x i,OPT − x i,B )•100 (15) by-class compatibility. It is underlined that the optimum surrogate and the bound surr gate for A, B, D gasolines are fully compatible in ethanol a-priori since the presence ethanol in those surrogates was constrained at zero by the user, being the real A, B, gasolines lacking in oxygenates (Table A1).…”
Section: Composition Unicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation