2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-008-0021-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of somaclonal variation in micropropagated plants of sugarcane by RAPD markers

Abstract: Sugarcane variety Co 94012 is a new variety released in India through the use of somaclonal variation. Significant differences were found in quantitative and qualitative agronomic characters. Another somaclone VSI 434 is an extra early maturing variety with significant difference in morphological and qualitative characters over the parent CoC 671. The genetic variation of micropropagated plantlets was tested by RAPD analysis. The banding pattern of PCR amplified products from micropropagated plantlets showed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data are similar to reports of others. There are a number of findings in the literature which report similar results for detection of genetic fidelity using molecular markers in different crops such as Solanum aculeatissimum (Ghimire et al 2012), Olea europaea (Leva and Petruccelli 2012), Saccharum officinarum (Tawar et al 2008), Dendrocalamus hamiltonii (Agnihotri et al 2009), Capparis deciduas (Tyagi et al 2010), Vanilla spp. (Sreedhar et al 2007), Dioscorea bulbifera (Narula et al 2007) and Musa spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The present data are similar to reports of others. There are a number of findings in the literature which report similar results for detection of genetic fidelity using molecular markers in different crops such as Solanum aculeatissimum (Ghimire et al 2012), Olea europaea (Leva and Petruccelli 2012), Saccharum officinarum (Tawar et al 2008), Dendrocalamus hamiltonii (Agnihotri et al 2009), Capparis deciduas (Tyagi et al 2010), Vanilla spp. (Sreedhar et al 2007), Dioscorea bulbifera (Narula et al 2007) and Musa spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Despite the interest in S. officinarum, there are only a few earlier reports on its regeneration through shoot tip cultures (11,17,18,34), apical meristem (10,33), leaf sheath (14), shoot tops (35), young leaf segments (19), nodal buds (8), young meristematic leaf sheath (31), immature leaf explants (39), leaf spindle explants, germinated seeds (9), shoot apex (22), tops with growing apices (30) The aim of the present study was to develop an efficient, reliable and promising protocol for regeneration of S. officinarum from bud explants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such variation may be attributed to existing DNA polymorphism (Tawar et al 2008), but, because most analyses have low coverage of the sugarcane genome (Taylor et al 1995), these differences may not result in any phenotypic manifestation. In our laboratories, although plants produced through indirect somatic embryogenesis showed more polymorphic bands (0.5-0.7%) than conventionally propagated (setts) controls, they were phenotypically similar regarding stalk mass, diameter, height, population density and sucrose yield after 9 mo in the field (Watt et al 2009).…”
Section: In Vitro Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%