2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assembly disposable degassing microfluidic device using a gas-permeable hydrophobic membrane and a reusable microsupport array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data also imply that the degassing rate obtained using the substrate with the micropillar array increased slightly compared to that obtained using the bare glass substrate, because the gas can be easily evacuated through the micropillar array. In particular, when the height of the micropillar array exceeds 4.2 μm, it no longer acts as a gas flow resistance [ 47 ]. As the vacuum pressure increases and the thickness of the degassing wall becomes thinner, the difference in degassing rates between the two experiments gradually increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data also imply that the degassing rate obtained using the substrate with the micropillar array increased slightly compared to that obtained using the bare glass substrate, because the gas can be easily evacuated through the micropillar array. In particular, when the height of the micropillar array exceeds 4.2 μm, it no longer acts as a gas flow resistance [ 47 ]. As the vacuum pressure increases and the thickness of the degassing wall becomes thinner, the difference in degassing rates between the two experiments gradually increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This degassing rate is similar to the previously reported in-plane degassing methods [ 9 , 39 ] where a vacuum tube was directly connected to the degassing line. Previously developed degassing method that used the PDMS membrane [ 47 ] was difficult to handle due to the high flexibility of the PDMS membrane. A substrate with a micropillar array was required to support the PDMS membrane for gas emission and to prevent it from sticking to the substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al 9 reported an upstream liquid-directed nozzle-type channel with a poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) venting membrane placed on top for rapid bubble removal. Moreover, Cho et al 10 reported an assembly disposable degassing method based on a microchannel network with an integrated poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) membrane. The reusable membrane, containing micro-support arrays, can be assembled and disassembled by vacuum pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remove these unexpected air bubbles in microdevices, many efforts have been attempted such as bubble traps, , separation chambers, hydrophobic membranes, and low-polarity liquid (e.g., ethanol and PBS). Recently, the involvement of numerical simulation has been regarded as an effective approach to investigate fluid behavior in microfluidics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unwanted bubbles can also lead to severe cell damage by rupturing the cell membrane 10,11 and device malfunction by disrupting the local electric field. 12 To remove these unexpected air bubbles in microdevices, many efforts have been attempted such as bubble traps, 10,13 separation chambers, 14 hydrophobic membranes, 15 and lowpolarity liquid (e.g., ethanol 16 and PBS 17 ). Recently, the involvement of numerical simulation has been regarded as an effective approach to investigate fluid behavior in microfluidics.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%