2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An arrival time picker for microseismic rock fracturing waveforms and its quality control for automatic localization in tunnels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some algorithms are helpful in improving the quality of the original waveform [19,44], but the processing algorithm is bound to cause some changes in the original waveform, and the processing process is also a certain source of error. A better way is to obtain relatively clear take-off points and other information indicators without waveform processing and then use them for positioning [45]. If the quality of the original waveform is high, there is no need for noise reduction, and the take-off points can be picked up manually for positioning [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some algorithms are helpful in improving the quality of the original waveform [19,44], but the processing algorithm is bound to cause some changes in the original waveform, and the processing process is also a certain source of error. A better way is to obtain relatively clear take-off points and other information indicators without waveform processing and then use them for positioning [45]. If the quality of the original waveform is high, there is no need for noise reduction, and the take-off points can be picked up manually for positioning [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For automatic first-arrival picking, deep learning has emerged as a prominent alternative to conventional approaches, as it can handle large datasets without requiring professional knowledge [ 27 ]. Particularly in recent years, several effective deep learning approaches have been presented for first-arrival picking, such as the combination of a regression convolutional neural network (CNN) and AIC [ 21 ], the parallel dual task network (PDTN) [ 28 ], CNN-based methods [ 29 , 30 ], feature pyramid networks (FPNs) [ 31 ], acoustic emission AEnet [ 32 ], CapsNet [ 33 , 34 ], PhaseNet [ 35 ], PickNet [ 36 ], the pixel-level network [ 37 ], U-net [ 38 ], and improved picking approaches using deep learning [ 39 , 40 ]. These approaches have demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that accuracy of seismic phases was promoted but the accuracy of recognition of valid signals was not high enough. Recently, Zhang et al (2021) proposed a residual link nested U-Net network (RLU-Net). This algorithm can be used to obtain P and S phases in low signal-to-noise conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the training samples are from the STA/LTA+AIC algorithm and no solution is given for wrong and missed pickup. In short, deep learning is currently the preferable algorithm to achieve automatic P-phase pickup (and Chen, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021). Nevertheless, how to resolve the contradiction between sample training and practical applications needs further consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%