2007
DOI: 10.1080/03605300600856758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approximation Scheme for Schrödinger Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
131
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of gauges for equation (1.1) was pioneered in [5], where orthonormal frames were first used in the context of Schrödinger maps. These constructions have been presented by J. Shatah, his students, and collaborators on several occasions (see [32], [33] and the references therein). Unlike in dimensions d ≥ 3, in dimension d = 2 it appears that one cannot use the standard Coulomb gauge, even if the analysis of the Schrödinger equation is combined with elliptic techniques such as the dynamical separation mentioned earlier.…”
Section: ∞ Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of gauges for equation (1.1) was pioneered in [5], where orthonormal frames were first used in the context of Schrödinger maps. These constructions have been presented by J. Shatah, his students, and collaborators on several occasions (see [32], [33] and the references therein). Unlike in dimensions d ≥ 3, in dimension d = 2 it appears that one cannot use the standard Coulomb gauge, even if the analysis of the Schrödinger equation is combined with elliptic techniques such as the dynamical separation mentioned earlier.…”
Section: ∞ Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that sufficiently smooth solutions exist locally in time, even for large data (see, for example, [40], [5], [8], [32] and the references therein). Such theorems for (local in time) smooth solutions are proved using delicate geometric variants of the energy method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here ⊥ denotes orthogonal projection onto the normal bundle, which, for a given point (x, t), is spanned by u(x, t). For more general analogues of (1-1), e.g., for Kähler targets other than ‫ޓ‬ 2 , see [Ding and Wang 2001;McGahagan 2007;Nahmod et al 2007]. See also [Kenig et al 2000;Kenig and Nahmod 2005;Bejenaru et al 2011b] for connections with other spin systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. See [Sulem et al 1986;Chang et al 2000;Ding and Wang 2001;McGahagan 2007] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation