Proceedings of the 21st International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3109729.3109743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for managing a distributed feature model to evolve self-adaptive dynamic software product lines

Abstract: While maintaining core assets of a product line, product line engineers may need to adapt the assets to accommodate new requirements and new devices from the changing and newly emerging markets. Additionally, due to the emergence of new computing environments like autonomous systems (e.g., ubiquitous computing and the Internet of Things), there is increasing demand for dynamic adaptations of core assets, and this often needs to be managed with minimum human intervention. We propose an approach for managing a d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modeling of dynamic variability has proved to be a great challenge due to aspects such as the number of variants and their relationships, traceability of the model variants being aligned to the variants represented in the architecture, reconfiguration representation of the variants according to the context of the environment, representation restrictions between variants, and context restrictions. Thus, some studies have extended the feature model to meet these challenges of representing dynamic variability [30][31][32]. However, few tools are supported for representing these extensions, such as the Variamos [24] and the DyMMer [25] tools.…”
Section: General Analysis Of the Solar Educational Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling of dynamic variability has proved to be a great challenge due to aspects such as the number of variants and their relationships, traceability of the model variants being aligned to the variants represented in the architecture, reconfiguration representation of the variants according to the context of the environment, representation restrictions between variants, and context restrictions. Thus, some studies have extended the feature model to meet these challenges of representing dynamic variability [30][31][32]. However, few tools are supported for representing these extensions, such as the Variamos [24] and the DyMMer [25] tools.…”
Section: General Analysis Of the Solar Educational Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the software configuration is yet to be modeled as a feature in the FMs. Other studies [22][23][24][25] have incorporated FMs into systems adaptation process, but no notions or extensions have been introduced into FMs to enable them to model these adaptation processes or their reused processes. A few works have enriched FMs using concepts and extensions to enable them to model SASs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%