1999
DOI: 10.12989/sem.1999.7.2.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for calculating the failure loads of unprotected concrete filled steel columns exposed to fire

Abstract: /npsi/ctrl?lang=en http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?lang=fr Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/jsp/nparc_cp.jsp?lang=en NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRCThis publication could be one of several versions: author's original, accepted manuscript or the publisher's version. / La version de cette publication peut être l'une des suivantes : la version prépubli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, at a certain temperature, the axial compression load N src (T) of the HRCFST section with plasticity concern, as expressed in equation (35), and stability coefficient u src (T ), as expressed in equation (37), for the axial compression load of the HRCFST column with stability concern can be verified by the present experimental value and other experiments. 13,[31][32][33][34][35][36] The ratio results of calculated value to experimental value for verification are tabulated in Table 4.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In summary, at a certain temperature, the axial compression load N src (T) of the HRCFST section with plasticity concern, as expressed in equation (35), and stability coefficient u src (T ), as expressed in equation (37), for the axial compression load of the HRCFST column with stability concern can be verified by the present experimental value and other experiments. 13,[31][32][33][34][35][36] The ratio results of calculated value to experimental value for verification are tabulated in Table 4.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The mean value of the ratios of the numerical results to the results from the formulas and the variance are, respectively, 0.975 and 0.012. The maximum error is within 7.5%, illustrating that the predictions from the formulas are sufficiently accurate compared to the predictions from other researchers [30,31] .…”
Section: Summary and Validation Of The Unified Formation For Preloadesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…for CFST columns was proved to be unsafe, which led to a recent inclusion of an amendment stating that the relative slenderness of the columns should be less than 0.5 for the use of the method. Under this context, a number of practical design formulas were proposed by many researchers, e.g., [24] , who conducted parametric analysis through experiments and numerical calculations, and proposed formulas for calculating fire resistance of solid circular and square CFST columns using regression analysis; Wang and Kodur (1999) [25] developed an approach for evaluating squash load and rigidity of solid CFST columns at elevated temperature based on Euro Code 4 [1] . Wang (2000) [26] presented a method for circular CFST columns with and without fire protection, which required point interpolation to obtain the squash load and rigidity of a column.…”
Section: Fig 1 Section Profiles Of Cfst Characterized By Their Intermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the authors' previous research [33] , a simplified method was proposed to calculate average temperature of the steel and the concrete in a CFST column, as shown in Eq. 24and (25). In this section, new research on calculating average temperature of unprotected CFST columns is presented.…”
Section: Average Temperature Of Unprotected Cfst Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%