2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2015.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for assessing high-penetration PV impact on distribution feeders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
27
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no PVGs at bus 2 as its voltage is nearly constant and the voltage drop between bus 2 and the substation transformer is acceptable. The PV penetration 31 in this study approaches the value of 82%. The distribution system is simulated at different test cases as listed in Table 2 to check the proposed control method and to validate the model with the given load flow results.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Test Feedermentioning
confidence: 52%
“…There is no PVGs at bus 2 as its voltage is nearly constant and the voltage drop between bus 2 and the substation transformer is acceptable. The PV penetration 31 in this study approaches the value of 82%. The distribution system is simulated at different test cases as listed in Table 2 to check the proposed control method and to validate the model with the given load flow results.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Test Feedermentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We also define an irradiance proxy measurement as φt. 1 We assume there are N households with solar generation and we define the customer load at each household i time t as L i t . We model the solar generation S i t using the irradiance proxy measurement φt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of loads and generation within a distribution network plays a crucial role [1]. The effect of PV generation on feeder operations vary widely, and can be either positive or negative depending on feeder topology, climate, and the timing of other connected loads [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e opposite is true when the sky shows transitions from cloudy to sunny conditions. e authors have explained this phenomenon by associating it with ambient temperature, i.e., as the sky shows transitions [59, 74-76, 78, 81, 84, 86-88, 94, 96, 99, 100, 107, 109, 110, 122, 123, 128, 129, 153, 155, 168, 171, 174, 176, 183, 187, 188, 200, 213, 214, 230, 235] Effect of system strength (R/X ratio) [155,177,234] Impact of PV on voltage swell/sag [145,169,170,194,211] Effects of cloud movements, cloud pattern, or shading [19,27,59,61,64,67,75,86,96,99,100,107,109,131,146,160,178,215,218,224,240,242,243,258] from sunny to cloudy, both solar irradiance and temperature decrease. A decrease in irradiance decreases the output power of PVs, but temperature drop has an inverse effect.…”
Section: Fast Changes In Powermentioning
confidence: 99%