2020
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1840975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An appraisal of emerging second line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 121 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether, since intensive conversion PO-SACT, including triplet with biologicals or hepatic artery infusion, is associated with high response and secondary resection rates [ 46 , 47 ], even when used as salvage options in pre-treated patients [ 26 , 48 , 49 ], it could be argued that if an intensive regimen is the only valid therapeutic option in selected patients with unresectable liver-predominantly metastases, the choice of the triplet, a biological, hepatic artery infusion or a combination of them within an aggressive onco-surgical strategy can still be expected to be associated with overall better survival chances than with a bland palliative chemotherapy, even in second-line [ 16 , 50 , 51 ]. Thus, the more effective is the conversion chemotherapy, the higher is the chance of inducing resectability of previously unresectable patients [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether, since intensive conversion PO-SACT, including triplet with biologicals or hepatic artery infusion, is associated with high response and secondary resection rates [ 46 , 47 ], even when used as salvage options in pre-treated patients [ 26 , 48 , 49 ], it could be argued that if an intensive regimen is the only valid therapeutic option in selected patients with unresectable liver-predominantly metastases, the choice of the triplet, a biological, hepatic artery infusion or a combination of them within an aggressive onco-surgical strategy can still be expected to be associated with overall better survival chances than with a bland palliative chemotherapy, even in second-line [ 16 , 50 , 51 ]. Thus, the more effective is the conversion chemotherapy, the higher is the chance of inducing resectability of previously unresectable patients [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%