2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2019.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An appraisal of crustal structure of the Indo-Burmese subduction region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Burmese region is the most seismically active zone in the Indian plate, where the Indian plate is underthrusting beneath the Burmese plate (Gahalaut & Kundu, 2016). The NNW-SSE-to NE-SWtrending Burmese region is extended up to 700 km and has a width of 250 km (Saikia et al, 2019). The average crustal thickness is * 43 km (Saikia et al, 2019).…”
Section: Burmese Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Burmese region is the most seismically active zone in the Indian plate, where the Indian plate is underthrusting beneath the Burmese plate (Gahalaut & Kundu, 2016). The NNW-SSE-to NE-SWtrending Burmese region is extended up to 700 km and has a width of 250 km (Saikia et al, 2019). The average crustal thickness is * 43 km (Saikia et al, 2019).…”
Section: Burmese Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NNW-SSE-to NE-SWtrending Burmese region is extended up to 700 km and has a width of 250 km (Saikia et al, 2019). The average crustal thickness is * 43 km (Saikia et al, 2019). There are a number of tectonic domains developed due to E-W directed compressive stresses induced by the subduction process (Baruah et al, 2013).…”
Section: Burmese Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The V S for the observed depth section is less than 4.0 km/s and therefore it is not possible to demarcate the Moho discontinuity. Along this E‐W directed path the Indian Plate is subducting beneath the Burma Plate (Saikia et al, 2019), and therefore it may be difficult to identify the Moho. Gradually increasing V S with increasing depth reaches the maximum value at 45–50 km depth followed by a decrease, low value for the section 50–70 km and a minimum at 60–65 km depth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the seismogenesis and geodynamic evolution of NE India, it is essential to study the crustal configuration. The collision and subduction tectonics in NE India resulted in lateral variations of crustal thickness and its compositions (Borah, Bora, Goyal, & Kumar, 2016; Hazarika, Arora, & Bora, 2012; Kundu, Hazarika, Hajra, Singh, & Ghosh, 2020; Mitra, Priestley, Bhattacharyya, & Gaur, 2005; Saikia et al, 2019). One of the best ways to understand the bulk composition of the crust is to estimate crustal Poisson's ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It helps to draw petrological and geochemical inferences related to the mineralogical composition of the crust as well as its formation and geodynamic evolution. The receiver function (RF) analysis (Langston, 1979; Vinnik, 1977) is one of the most widely used techniques to estimate crustal thickness and average Poisson's ratio of crust in the Himalaya (e.g., Borah et al, 2016; Hajra, Hazarika, Bankhwal, Kundu, & Kumar, 2019; Hazarika, Kumar, & Yadav, 2013; Hazarika, Sen, & Kumar, 2014; Kundu et al, 2020; Paul & Mitra, 2017; Saikia et al, 2019; Wadhawan et al, 2017) and elsewhere (e.g., Chevrot & van der Hilst, 2000; Lombardi, Braunmiller, Kissling, & Giardini, 2008; Zhu & Kanamori, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%