2020
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/saz072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Applied Empirical Framework for Invasion Science: Confronting Biological Invasion Through Collaborative Research Aimed at Tool Production

Abstract: Global ecosystem functions, services, and commodities are increasingly threatened by biological invasions. As a result, there is an urgent need to manage invasive species through global collaborative research. We propose an ‘applied empirical framework’ (AEF) to aggressively confront the current global biological invasion crisis. The AEF builds on existing models for invasion science that advocate 1) standardized research designs to reveal key aspects of biological invasion, and 2) collaborative research to fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High percentages of non-English costs were also reported in other countries, such as in Spain or Japan (98%, Angulo et al 2021c;and 100%, Watari et al 2021, respectively), and this percentage was lower but also important in countries such as Germany or Ecuador (69%, Haubrock et al 2021b;52%, Ballesteros-Mejias et al 2021) or in general in the Central and South America continent and in Asia (Heringer et al 2021;Liu et al 2021). In line with the recent suggestion from Blackburn et al (2020), this observation proves that academics must continue their engagements towards a more collaborative science for improving the sharing of knowledge and having adequate communication of invasion science findings to the public (Mattingly et al 2020), and ultimately an ability to better tackle the issues caused by invasive alien species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…High percentages of non-English costs were also reported in other countries, such as in Spain or Japan (98%, Angulo et al 2021c;and 100%, Watari et al 2021, respectively), and this percentage was lower but also important in countries such as Germany or Ecuador (69%, Haubrock et al 2021b;52%, Ballesteros-Mejias et al 2021) or in general in the Central and South America continent and in Asia (Heringer et al 2021;Liu et al 2021). In line with the recent suggestion from Blackburn et al (2020), this observation proves that academics must continue their engagements towards a more collaborative science for improving the sharing of knowledge and having adequate communication of invasion science findings to the public (Mattingly et al 2020), and ultimately an ability to better tackle the issues caused by invasive alien species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Doing so is necessary to prevent the emergence of small, separate populations of alien species, whose detection and eradication has been shown to be more important than that of large populations (Mack and Lonsdale 2002). This result provides support for the importance of the species-targeted, cross-boundary control efforts for invasive alien species of agricultural and environmental concern that have been advocated elsewhere (Epanchin-Niell and Hastings 2010; Kark et al 2015;Blackburn et al 2020).…”
Section: Effects Of Cross-boundary Management On the Trajectories To supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Thus, the SInAS workflow will help to differentiate and integrate the various approaches, and finally will increase trust not only in data but also in study results and conclusions communicated to the decision makers and the general public (Franz and Sterner 2018). The potential to customise and extend the workflow increases the range of possible applications such as the calculation of indicators (e.g., Wilson et al 2018), the ability to conduct global and regional assessments of invasive alien species and their control, and the global collaboration being proposed as essential for dealing with priority invaders (Blackburn et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%