“…Refining earlier ideas about the learned modulatory role of energy state signals (e.g., Davidson, 1993, 2000; Davidson & Benoit, 1996; Harris, Gorissen, Bailey, & Westbrook, 2000), we recently proposed that the ability of satiety cues to inhibit eating behavior depends on the operation of a learning and memory mechanism analogous to the one underlying the solution to a Pavlovian serial feature negative (FN) problem (e.g., Davidson, Kanoski, Schier, Clegg, & Benoit, 2007; Davidson, Kanoski, Walls, & Jarrard, 2005; Davidson et al, 2014). Serial FN problems take the general form of A+, X→A-, where the presentation of Stimulus A (e.g., a tone) signals the delivery of a US (+) on trials when it is presented alone, but not on trials when it is preceded by the presentation a different cue, Stimulus X (e.g., a light).…”