2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-008-0700-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Application of Mirror Extensions

Abstract: In this paper we apply our previous results of mirror extensions to obtain realizations of three modular invariants constructed by A. N. Schellekens by holomorphic conformal nets with central charge equal to 24.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ω li with i even will generate local simple currents (cf Definition 2.3 and Prop. 2.15 of [36]), and it follows that the left local support of c is nontrivial if li = 0modn for some even i. So we conclude that 2l = 0modn, and…”
Section: And By Computing Statistical Dimension [λmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These ω li with i even will generate local simple currents (cf Definition 2.3 and Prop. 2.15 of [36]), and it follows that the left local support of c is nontrivial if li = 0modn for some even i. So we conclude that 2l = 0modn, and…”
Section: And By Computing Statistical Dimension [λmentioning
confidence: 64%
“….3 and Prop. 2.15 of[36]), and it follows that the left local support of c is nontrivial if li = 0modn for some even i. So we conclude that 2l = 0modn, and [cc] =[1] + [ω m ].Note that there are λ 1 , λ 2 such thatc 1 ≺ λ 1 c,c 2 ∈ λ 2 c. From c 1 , λ 1 c = c 1c , λ 1 ≥ 1, we have d c 1 √ 2 ≥ d λ 1 , and similarly dc 2 √ 2 ≥ d λ 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This is actually so in all examples studied here, and in particular for the SU(4) ⊂ Spin (20) case which can also be recognized as the smallest member (n = 1) of a D 2n+1 ⊂ D (n+1)(4n+1) family of conformal embeddings appearing on table 4 of the standard reference [3], and on table II(a) of the standard reference [38], since SU(4) ≃ Spin(6). This embedding, which is "special" (i.e., non regular: unequal ranks and Dynkin index not equal to 1), does not seem to be quoted in other standard references on conformal embeddings (for instance [24,27,40]), although it is explicitly mentioned in [1] and although its rank-level dual is indirectly used in case 18 of [37], or in [43]. The corresponding SU(4) modular invariant was later recovered by [31], using arithmetical methods, and used to determine the E 8 (SU(4)) quantum graph, but since the existence of an associated conformal embedding had slipped into oblivion, it was incorrectly stated that this particular example could not be obtained from conformal embedding considerations.…”
Section: Forewordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many examples on this list have been realized (cf. [31,32,11], [55]). We note that the examples in [31,32,11] [10]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many examples on this list have been realized (cf. [31,32,11], [55]). We note that the examples in [31,32,11] are given in the language of lattice VOAs, their orbifolds, and affine Kac-Moody algebras.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%