2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-017-2939-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examples of Subfactors from Conformal Field Theory

Abstract: Conformal field theory (CFT) in two dimensions provide a rich source of subfactors. The fact that there are so many subfactors coming from CFT have led people to conjecture that perhaps all finite depth subfactors are related to CFT. In this paper we examine classes of subfactors from known CFT. In particular we identify the so called 3 Z2×Z2 subfactor with an intermediate subfactor from conformal inclusion, and construct new subfactors from recent work on holomorphic CFT with central charge 24. * Supported in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the author was unable to find a suitable description of the category of modules in this case. Instead we have [52,Theorem 3.2] which proves the precise statement in this case. They show that C 5,5,5 is the even part of the 3 Z 2 ×Z 2 subfactor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the author was unable to find a suitable description of the category of modules in this case. Instead we have [52,Theorem 3.2] which proves the precise statement in this case. They show that C 5,5,5 is the even part of the 3 Z 2 ×Z 2 subfactor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…We now deal with the case of C(sl 5 , 5) 0 Rep(Z 5 ) . This case has been examined in the literature previously [52,29]. Rep(Z 5 ) ) × S 3 has a subgroup isomorphic to A 4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [Izu18] that there is a unique generalized Haagerup category C for G = Z 2 × Z 2 . This category is related to a conformal inclusion SU (5) 5 ⊂ Spin(24); see [Xu18;Edi21a]. It was shown in [Gro19] that the Brauer-Picard group of this category has order 360, and the group was identified as S 3 × A 5 in [Edi21a].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our other application is to the generalized Haagerup category for the group Z 2 × Z 2 . This category is related to a conformal inclusion SU (5) 5 ⊂ Spin(24); see [Xu18;Edi21a]. This category is interesting because its Brauer-Picard group is unusually rich: it was shown in [Gro19] that this group has order 360, and it was identified as S 3 × A 5 in [Edi21a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework was discovered by accident in the land of quantum field theory as we will now explain, see the following survey for more details [Bro19b]. Conformal field theories (in short CFT) à la Haag-Kastler provide subfactors and conversely certain subfactors provide CFT but the reconstruction is on a case by case basis and so far the most intriguing subfactors (with exotic representation theory uncaptured by groups and quantum groups) are not known to provide a CFT [EK92,JMS14,Bis17,Xu18]. By using the planar algebra of a subfactor, Jones created a lattice model approximating the desired CFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%