An Application of Mental Tests to University Students.*

White, Hannah

doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1931.tb02673.x

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…g measure "T" measure Eysenck (1940) Verbal intelligence test (White, 1931) Ad hoc measure Child (1962) "Scholastic Aptitude Test Verbal" (not referenced) Ad hoc measure Götz et al (1979) "IQ" (not further specified or referenced) Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test (Götz et al, 1979) Götz (1987 Standard Progressive Matrices (Raven, 1941) Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test (Götz, 1985) Frois andEysenck (1995) Standard Progressive Matrices (Raven, 1941) Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test (Götz, 1985) Furnham and Wonderlic Personnel Test (Wonderlic, 1992) Design Judgment Test (Graves, 1948) Chamorro-Premuzic and Wonderlic Personnel Test (Wonderlic, 1992) and Standard Progressive Matrices (Raven, 1941) Meier Art Tests (Meier, 1942) Bezruczko and Frois (2011) Collective Scale of Intellectual Level (Benedetto & Clerc, 1969) and Standard Progressive Matrices (Raven, 1941) Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test (Götz, 1985) Myszkowski et al (2014 Standard Progressive Matrices (Raven, 1941) Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test (Götz, 1985) This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.…”

Section: Publicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and visual “taste” measures.

Myszkowski

Çelik

Storme

2018

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What makes individuals experts in judging aesthetic value is actively researched in a variety of ways. In the visual domain, one classical paradigm-used in "T" (for Taste) tests (Eysenck, 1983)-consists in comparing one's evaluative judgments of beauty with a standard judgment-provided by consensual or expert agreement. The association between general intelligence (g) and performance in "T" tests has been investigated since over 70 years (Eysenck, 1940;Myszkowski, Storme, Zenasni, & Lubart, 2014), but has led to a variety results, from negative weak to positive strong correlations. We aimed at clearing the resulting confusion through a meta-analysis of the correlations observed in the literature (k ϭ 23, N ϭ 1,531). We found a significant positive weak to moderate correlation between g and "T" ( ϭ .30, 95% CI (confidence interval) ϭ [.23, .36], z ϭ 9.00, p Ͻ .001), suggesting that common cognitive processes are involved in both g and "T". Reinforcing this conclusion, no publication bias was found through the regression test, and none of the tested moderators-year of publication, gender, age, "T" measure, and g measure-had a significant effect on the correlation.

show abstract