Infotech@Aerospace 2011 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-1413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Application of Evidence Theory to Subject Matter Expert Based Technology Portfolio Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An even more general method than D-S theory is Dezer-Smarandache (DSm) theory, which uses new models for the FD and new rules of combination to take into account paradoxical and uncertain information. 108 Akram and Mavris use D-S theory for a technology valuation process / technology portfolio analysis, [109][110][111][112][113] and conclude it is better capable of providing insight into epistemic uncertainties, as compared to deterministic or probability theory methods. Additionally they state: "It reduces the number of assumptions during the elicitation process, when experts are forced to assign probability distributions to their opinions without sufficient knowledge."…”
Section: B Uncertainty Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An even more general method than D-S theory is Dezer-Smarandache (DSm) theory, which uses new models for the FD and new rules of combination to take into account paradoxical and uncertain information. 108 Akram and Mavris use D-S theory for a technology valuation process / technology portfolio analysis, [109][110][111][112][113] and conclude it is better capable of providing insight into epistemic uncertainties, as compared to deterministic or probability theory methods. Additionally they state: "It reduces the number of assumptions during the elicitation process, when experts are forced to assign probability distributions to their opinions without sufficient knowledge."…”
Section: B Uncertainty Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, to propose innovation in critical conditions, private initiative uses its available resources as human capital or economic resources. In the two case studies, human capital, particularly the knowledge of legal practice, is fundamental to activate "negative capabilities" and develop "expertdriven" (Prior et al 2011;Potts et al 2010) IT innovation.…”
Section: Negative Capabilities: Organizational Precondition For Techn...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some cases presented later in this article (Section 4), ICTs created by the private initiatives Laws 2022, 11, 51 of lawyers for justice professionals bridge the gap between public administration services incapable of keeping pace with technological evolution. Like other areas of application, these forms of innovation can be defined as subject-matter expert-driven IT developments (Prior et al 2011;Potts et al 2010) (different from simple private-driven innovations) due to the requirement of legal expertise for proposing expert technological solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though all of the mentioned research uses probability theory, there are alternatives: Bayesian theory, possibility theory [14], interval analysis [15,16], and Dempster-Schafer (D-S) theory [17][18][19]. Akram et al [20][21][22][23][24] use D-S theory for a technology valuation process-technology portfolio analysis. While there are strong arguments against theories other than (subjective) probability theory [25,26], the most relevant argument in the current context is that only Bayesian theory supports the inverse problem, besides probability theory.…”
Section: Selecting Technologies In Aircraft Conceptualmentioning
confidence: 99%