2020
DOI: 10.1049/cje.2019.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An APD‐Based Evaluation on the Effect of Transient Disturbance over Digital Transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, looking at the weakness of the swept frequency-domain method and achieving a better definition of the susceptibility of modern digital communication systems (DCSs), the Amplitude Probability Distribution (APD) method is being studied [69][70][71][72][73], e.g., in place of other types of detectors, such as the QP. The APD quantifies the amount of time that the measured envelope r(t) of an interfering signal exceeds a given level [69], or, in other words, it is the complement to unity of the cumulative distribution function of the envelope.…”
Section: Time Domain and Amplitude Probability Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, looking at the weakness of the swept frequency-domain method and achieving a better definition of the susceptibility of modern digital communication systems (DCSs), the Amplitude Probability Distribution (APD) method is being studied [69][70][71][72][73], e.g., in place of other types of detectors, such as the QP. The APD quantifies the amount of time that the measured envelope r(t) of an interfering signal exceeds a given level [69], or, in other words, it is the complement to unity of the cumulative distribution function of the envelope.…”
Section: Time Domain and Amplitude Probability Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has proved that the statistics of EMI in the time-domain are directly related to the error performance of digital radiocommunication systems with different modulation and coding schemes (MCSs). Some of them has focused on the interfered digital modulation signals, and the maximum bit error probability of the radio receiver was derived based on the APD of arbitrary interference [18][19][20], without consideration of the forward error correction (FEC) coding gain. As the coding gain is closely related to the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) of a code block, which is determined by both the amplitude and duration of a burst, the impact on RSTT with FEC is much more complex than digital modulation signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%