2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14030759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Review of EMC Standards for the Measurement of Radiated Electromagnetic Emissions from Transit Line and Rolling Stock

Abstract: Accurate and comprehensive methods for the assessment of radiated electromagnetic emissions in modern electric transportation systems are a necessity. The characteristics and susceptibility of modern victim signaling and communication radio services, operating within and outside the right-of-way, require an update of the measurement methods integrating or replacing the swept frequency technique with time domain approaches. Applicable standards are the EN 50121 (equivalent to the IEC 62236) and Urban Mass Trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such detectors may be an rms detector, a peak detector, or a quasi-peak detector, the latter causing some concern. Its use is supported by CISPR and generally by RF EMC standards as an emissions weighting for a hypothetical jamming of analog radio transmissions for broadcasting purposes (no longer so widely used in the modern world of digital communication);its output being dependent on the time distribution of the spectral characteristics of the incoming signal, it can hardly be compared to a simpler rms or peak detector, as commented in [ 78 ] for impulsive emissions originating from pantograph electric arcs. Nonetheless, its application is still mandatory and has recently attracted a lot of effort to devise an efficient time-domain implementation [ 79 , 80 ].…”
Section: Lessons Learned and Compatibility Levels For The Sh Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such detectors may be an rms detector, a peak detector, or a quasi-peak detector, the latter causing some concern. Its use is supported by CISPR and generally by RF EMC standards as an emissions weighting for a hypothetical jamming of analog radio transmissions for broadcasting purposes (no longer so widely used in the modern world of digital communication);its output being dependent on the time distribution of the spectral characteristics of the incoming signal, it can hardly be compared to a simpler rms or peak detector, as commented in [ 78 ] for impulsive emissions originating from pantograph electric arcs. Nonetheless, its application is still mandatory and has recently attracted a lot of effort to devise an efficient time-domain implementation [ 79 , 80 ].…”
Section: Lessons Learned and Compatibility Levels For The Sh Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the applied CM voltage of the inductor corresponds to (2), the magnetic flux Φ inside the inductor corresponds to (3).…”
Section: Calculation Of Maximum Flux Density In the Core Of The CM In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traction inverters for rolling stock, the reduction of electromagnetic interference (EMI) is particular importance [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Various measures are required to comply with the limitations of international standards such as IEC 62236 series (European standards are EN 50121 series) and requirements such as EN 50238 series for electromagnetic radiation from different railway signaling systems [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a parallel to other systems featuring large apparatus, relevant factors with impact on uncertainty and reproducibility are: i) emissions from a long cable line connected to the motor or generator, that can be borrowed from the scenario of the catenary feeding line in electrified railways [94]; ii) moving source in case of vehicles and electrified transports, as well as moving industrial apparatus (e.g. for positioning or tooling); iii) variability of operating conditions for large machines that cannot be bench tested under satisfactory conditions.…”
Section: Uncertainty and Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%