An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population

Khan, Raeesa; Satyapal, K. S.; Lazarus, Lelika; Naidoo, Nerissa

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03107

Cited by 7 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(36 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…So if the weight or the body stature of the patient is unknown then it can help decide the size of glenoid fossa. Kreiehoff also worked on this topic and found that the orientation or the dimension of the glenoid cavity can be estimated by measuring the angle the glenoid cavity makes with the scapular spine [14][15] . Also one more way to calculate the dimension of the glenoid cavity is to measure the angle between glenoid cavity and lateral border and also it can be measured by finding the angle between median border and glenoid cavity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of Dimensions of Glenoid Cavity from other Scapular Parameters

Shabeer¹,

Billah²,

Baloch³

et al. 2022

PJMHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Different pathological conditions are associated with the anatomical variations in glenoid cavity. For getting insights into these variations the anthropometric parameters knowledge is highly required. Objective: The purpose of the study was the determination of the anthropometric relationship present between the left and right side of the glenoid cavity of the scapula and the application of the obtained knowledge in the forensic medicine. Place and Duration: In the department of anatomy, Multan Medical and Dental College and Bacha Khan Medical Complex Swabi for six months duration, from January 2021 to June 2021. Material and Methods: The data of 190 patients included in the study, was collected from the anatomy department of our institute. The sample was withdrawn from the non-deformed and well macerated scapulae bone of the 190 patients. The calibrated sliding digital caliper was used to measure the anthropometric parameters of glenoid cavity. The glenoid height, width and index were calculated by SPSS software. Results: The 34.8±4.0 (R=38 ± 4.98 and L=27.9-46.78) and 24.9 ±3.90 (R=27.2 ± 3.43 and L=20.1- 36) was the calculated mean standard deviation of Maximum glenoid height (MGH) and Maximum glenoid width (MGW) respectively. The statistically significant and greater values of MGH and MGW on the right side were obtained by using ANOVA and t-test. While calculated values of glenoid Index (GI) was smaller on the right side as compared to the left. Conclusion: The kinanthropological applications of the scapula are indicated by the study that which side can be more commonly used. This study provides with in-depth knowledge of biological profiling and develops better understanding required during reconstruction of the damaged skeleton. Keywords: Glenoid cavity, Maximum glenoid height (MGH), Maximum glenoid width (MGW).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of Dimensions of Glenoid Cavity from other Scapular Parameters

Shabeer¹,

Billah²,

Baloch³

et al. 2022

PJMHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Various researchers have performed the morphometric analysis of cavitas glenoidalis on different materials (dry bone, fresh cadaver or 3D-CT reconstruction) in different populations [7,10,18,21,22,28]. This study is a radiological study and measurements were performed through multidetector CT.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We believe that higher values of our study than all other researches may be associated with race Prescher and Klümpen (1997) [4] stated about the cause of such difference as loose attachment of the glenoid labrum onto the GC at notch area. In the absence of the glenoid notch, the glenoid labrum is attached along GC margins; therefore, the shoulder joint is more stable [6,7]. We reviewed GCs with notch according to the notch count.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Morphometric Analysis of Cavitas Glenoidalis with Multidedector CT

2021

Turk J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The glenoid cavity is a sliced egg-shaped joint surface located on the lateral margin of the scapula to form the shoulder joint. Antero-superior notch affects the morphology of the glenoid cavity. Recognition of variations in shape and dimensions of the glenoid cavity is important for better comprehension of joint-associated diseases, especially in total shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The aim of this study was to perform morphometric measurements on the glenoid cavity through Multi-detector Computed Tomography images. Methods: Glenoid cavities of 391 individuals (197 males (50.4%), 194 females (49.6%)) were reviewed by using Multi-detector Computed Tomography. CT images were examined from January 2014 to April 2016 by scanning files. The average age of men was 60.28 ± 15.43, while the average age of women was 58.82 ± 16.38. The maximum length and maximum width of glenoid cavities, the width, depth and circumference at the notch level were measured, and the index value was calculated. The glenoid cavity shapes were typed as pear, inverted comma and oval type. Furthermore, metric values which provide the best differentiation between genders were found through ROC analysis. Results: The pear GC type was detected by 53.2%, inverted comma type was detected by 28.4%, and oval type was detected by 18.4%. In all of our morphometric measurements, male values were higher than female values, and there was no significant difference between them. Furthermore, significant differences were found for width at the notch level and circumference lengths between the right and left sides; however, there was not any significant difference between maximum length, maximum width, depth and the index (p<0.05). Results of ROC analysis revealed significant measurements for the maximum length and maximum width measurements of the glenoid for gender determination. Conclusions: It was reported in the literature that morphometric information of the glenoid cavity is useful to increase clinical success in case of different pathological conditions such as Bankart lesion, rotator cuff disease, and osteochondral defect. Recognition of different shapes and dimensions of the glenoid cavity is essential for the design of the glenoid component especially for total shoulder arthroplasty procedure. We

show abstract

“…This is similar to previous studies. 3,21 The mean of the normal Indonesian glenoid inclination, which was measured using β angle, was 74.0° and the mean of the normal Indonesian glenoid version was 12.3° retroversion. 6 It was difficult to compare both the glenoid inclination and version with previous studies due to differences in measurement methods.…”

Section: Morphometrymentioning

confidence: 99%

Morphology of Humeral Head and Glenoid in Normal Shoulder of Indonesian Population

Suroto¹,

Licindo²,

Wibowo³

et al. 2022

ORR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Shoulder prostheses designed and used around the world may not fit an Asian shoulder. Normal shoulder morphology in Asian population had been reported, ie, Chinese, Indian, Japanese, and Thai populations, but no data from the Indonesian population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of the glenohumeral joint in the normal Indonesian population, identify its normal values, and compare them with those of other populations in the literature. Patients and Methods Images for analysis were computed tomography (CT) scans of 85 normal shoulders from 71 patients who had CT scans for another diagnosis. Morphometry of the humeral head and glenoid were measured using 3D reconstruction. Gender differences and correlations between age, height, and glenohumeral morphometry were evaluated. Indonesians’ glenohumeral morphometry was compared with those of other populations in the literature. Results In the normal Indonesian population, the mean of humeral head inclination (HHI), height (HHH), diameter in sagittal plane (DS), diameter in frontal plane (DF), radius of curvature in sagittal plane (RS), and radius of curvature in frontal plane (RF) were 134.1°, 15.6mm, 39.3mm, 41.3mm, 20.4mm, and 21.4mm, respectively. The glenoid height (GH), upper width (GUW), lower width (GLW), inclination (GI), and version (GV) mean values were 34.2mm, 18.4mm, 24.5mm, 74.0mm, and 12.3mm, respectively. There was a significant difference in HHH, DS, DF, RS, RF, GH, GUW, GLW between males and females. Except for HHI and GI, glenohumeral morphometry was correlated with patient height. Age was not correlated with any glenohumeral morphometry. Conclusion In the Indonesian population, males had a larger humeral head and glenoid than females, and the size of the humeral head and glenoid was correlated to body height. Indonesians’ humeral head and glenoid sizes were smaller than those of Western populations, but close to those of other Asian populations.

show abstract

An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population

Cited by 7 publications

References 26 publications

Determination of Dimensions of Glenoid Cavity from other Scapular Parameters

Determination of Dimensions of Glenoid Cavity from other Scapular Parameters

Morphometric Analysis of Cavitas Glenoidalis with Multidedector CT

Morphology of Humeral Head and Glenoid in Normal Shoulder of Indonesian Population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About