2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06068-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical prediction model for residual stress distribution and plastic deformation depth in ultrasonic-assisted single ball burnishing process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Residual stresses can be predicted analytically by knowing the cutting temperature and mechanical loading history. [ 255 ] Liu and co‐workers [ 256 ] proposed an analytical model for predicting the residual stress distribution and depth of plastic deformation in the ultrasonic‐assisted single‐ball burnishing process. The accuracy of the residual stress predictive model in the worst case was less than 20%, which was acceptable compared with other predictive models.…”
Section: Origins and Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual stresses can be predicted analytically by knowing the cutting temperature and mechanical loading history. [ 255 ] Liu and co‐workers [ 256 ] proposed an analytical model for predicting the residual stress distribution and depth of plastic deformation in the ultrasonic‐assisted single‐ball burnishing process. The accuracy of the residual stress predictive model in the worst case was less than 20%, which was acceptable compared with other predictive models.…”
Section: Origins and Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the impact velocity increases, the impact energy which is converted to plastic working also increases. Thus, increase of plastic working yields further plastic strain and work hardening of the surface [19,20]. Thus, the surface hardness will increase.…”
Section: Parametric Influence Of Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of ultrasonic vibration increases the thickness of the gradient nanostructure [22,23]. Nevertheless, ultrasonic-assisted surface burnishing process has a higher coefficient of friction (COF) than surface burnishing process, which not conducive to surface roughness [24]. In the machining process, the two-dimensional vibration can further optimize the cycle of stress loading, lessen the fluctuation of the machining force, and reduce COF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to establish more accurate regression equations. Take BD =[7,8,9,10,11], SS =[17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], FR=5, then solve regression Eqs. (4),(5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%