The heat transfer behavior of accreting ice surfaces in natural (flight test) and simulated (wind tunnel) cloud icing conditions are studied. Observations of wet and dry ice growth regimes as measured by ultrasonic pulseecho techniques are made. Observed wet and dry ice growth regimes at the stagnation point of a cylinder are compared with those predicted using a quasi steady-state heat balance model. A series of heat transfer coefficients are employed by the model to infer the local heat transfer behavior of the actual ice surfaces. The heat transfer in the stagnation region is generally inferred to be higher in wind tunnel icing tests than in natural, flight icing conditions.
NomenclatureA,B -experimentally derived constants (-) Q = specific heat capacity of ice* J/kg K C p -specific heat capacity of air, J/kg K C w = specific heat capacity of water, J/kg K D = diffusion coefficient of water vapor in air, mVs d = cylinder diameter, m h = local convective heat transfer coefficient, W/m 2 K k = thermal conductivity of air, W/m K L f = latent heat of fusion of water, J/kg L s = latent heat of sublimation of water, J/kg L v = latent heat of vaporization of water, J/kg L* = effective latent heat of fusion M" = local mass flux/time, kg/m 2 s Nu -Nusselt number (-) Q " = local heat flux/time, W/m 2 Re = Reynolds number based on cylinder diameter and y (X (-) r = recovery factor, 0.875 (-) A TV = cloud supercooling = -T^ (° C) T'surf = equilibrium surface temperature, °Ĉ = cloud temperature, °C T* = effective surface freestream temperature difference, °C t = icing time, s Fa, = freestream velocity, m/s W = cloud liquid water content, g/m 3 18= local collection efficiency (-) Py,surf = saturated vapor density over surface, kg/m 3 p voo = saturated vapor density in cloud, kg/m 3