2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11804-015-1304-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical approach for assessing the collapse strength of an unbonded flexible pipe

Abstract: This paper presents an analytical scheme for predicting the collapse strength of a flexible pipe, which considers the structural interaction between relevant layers. The analytical results were compared with a FEA model and a number of test data, and showed reasonably good agreement. The theoretical analysis showed that the pressure armor layer enhanced the strength of the carcass against buckling, though the barrier weakened this effect. The collapse strength of pipe was influenced by many factors such as the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, many equivalent methods were proposed in terms of one property of the carcass, e.g. the cross-section area, the bending stiffness or strain energy [24,[44][45][46][47]. Area equivalent method [44] was carried out based on the equivalence of cross-sectional areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, many equivalent methods were proposed in terms of one property of the carcass, e.g. the cross-section area, the bending stiffness or strain energy [24,[44][45][46][47]. Area equivalent method [44] was carried out based on the equivalence of cross-sectional areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Area equivalent method [44] was carried out based on the equivalence of cross-sectional areas. One another similar method was to use the actual thickness of the interlocked layers directly but with a fraction fill coefficient that calculated based on area equivalency [24]. As the ring thickness is simply determined by the cross-sectional area in those methods, the actual material distribution in the carcass profile is neglected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations