2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2015.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis on travel party composition and expenditure: a discrete-continuous model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incidentally, the analytic solution of this LV model is the logit model [ 11 ]. This shows that there is a very strong connection between the dynamic model proposed in this paper and the approach adopted by the mainstream literature on the study of touristic flows [ 24 26 ]. Importantly, in line with mainstream literature, this model features an outside good or option.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Incidentally, the analytic solution of this LV model is the logit model [ 11 ]. This shows that there is a very strong connection between the dynamic model proposed in this paper and the approach adopted by the mainstream literature on the study of touristic flows [ 24 26 ]. Importantly, in line with mainstream literature, this model features an outside good or option.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As observed by many (Dellaert et al, 1998;Gong et al, 2018;Jeng & Fesenmaier, 2002;Rashidi & Koo, 2016;Woodside & Dubelaar, 2002;Wu et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2012), tourism decision-making is an integrated process within which tourists are required to make a series of decisions involving travel participation, travel party composition, time of travel, destination, length of stay and expenditure, etc. In single tourism choice models, the modelling framework does not embed the capacity to test for interrelations between the modelled travel choice and myriad of other travel choices (Rashidi & Koo, 2016). The consequence is potentially biased results, which may generate misleading policy implications with unintended consequences (Wu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, joint modelling of multiple choices has attracted the interest of an increasing number of researchers. These include the modelling of interrelation between tourism participation and expenditure (Wu et al, 2013), multi-destination trips and transport modes (Masiero & Zoltan, 2013), tourism participation, length of stay and associated expenditure (Yang et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2012), travel party composition and expenditure (Rashidi & Koo, 2016), travel participation and trip duration (Bhat, 2005;LaMondia et al, 2008;Van Nostrand et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2011), destination choices and length of stay (Gong et al, 2018) and transport modes and length of stay (Pellegrini & Scagnolari, 2019). However, it is noted that vast majority of current modelling practice in travel and tourism research focuses on single tourism choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is however a large body of literature on the general population that have examined the key determinants of tourism expenditure. While Brida and Scuderi (2013) provide a comprehensive review of microeconometric models on what determines tourist expenditure, recent studies in this area include Bernini and Cracolici (2015), Rashidi and Koo (2016) and Wu, Zhang, and Fujiwara (2013). By and large, income, age, and education were found to be keys determinants of tourism expenditure.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the evidence that income support from children was significant in retiree's tourism behaviour in Taiwan (C. Chen & Chen, 2018), the amount of financial transfer from children is included. Drawing from the literature (Bernini & Cracolici, 2015;Jang & Ham, 2009;Kuo & Lu, 2013;Rashidi & Koo, 2016;Smith & Diekmann, 2017;Wu et al, 2013), other variables such as education, home ownership, gender, marital status (married/partner and otherwise), urban/rural, and retired/working are also considered in both models. The latter five variables are dummy variables taking the value of one or zero while the first two are ordered variables explained under Table 4.1.…”
Section: Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%