Conformational energy calculations using the empirical MM2 (molecular mechanics 11) and semiempirical quantum mechanical PCILO (perturbative configuration interaction using localized orbitals) methods are reported for various prodine derivatives. These include 3-demethylprodine, a-prodine, /I-prodine, the a-2-methyl derivative, a-promedol, the y-2,3-dimethyl derivative, and y-isopromedol. The results are consistent with all of the compounds activating the opiate receptor in a phenyl equatorial conformation with optimum activity resulting from a particular orientation of the phenyl and propionoxyl groups. In disagreement with previous limited experimental data, a-promedol is found to prefer a phenyl equatorial conformer. I t is confirmed that, of the two mirror image phenyl equatorial conformers that are preferred for 3-demethylprodine, the more active prodines antipodes consistently prefer the one in which the phenyl orientation is the opposite (mirror image) of that found in morphine and in the preferred conformer of the morphine-like ( + )-phenylmorphan. This is a possible molecular basis for the nonmorphine-like effects that occur with the introduction of a phenyl meta hydroxyl into some prodine derivatives. I t is also suggested that the less active prodine antipodes, which have a morphine-like phenyl orientation, may act in a morphine-like manner a t opiate receptors.There are four major conformers that are possible for the prodines (Figs. 1-3) which are 4-phenylpiperidine opiate analgesics. First, the phenyl ring can be either in an equatorial or axial position on the piperidine ring. Secondly, there appear to be two preferred orientations of the phenyl and propionoxyl groups with each of the above due to the symmetry of the piperidine ring.' These are shown in Figure 1 for 3-demethylprodine in a phenyl equatorial conformation. In previously performed MM2 (molecular mechanics 11) calculations,' phenyl equatorial conformations were preferred by 1.9, 2.8, and 3.4 kcal/mol for 3-demethyl-, a-, and P-prodine in qualitative agreement with previous computational results using the semiempirical quantum mechanical PCILO method' and with experimental results. Somewhat unexpectedly, a phenyl equatorial conformation was calculated to be particularly preferred for P-prodine despite its having two axial piperidine substituents and only one equatorial one.' This was attributed to steric interactions among the three piperidine substituents in a phenyl axial conformer.With respect to the two preferred phenyl equatorial conformers, these have identical energies in 3-demethylprodine (Fig. 1) since the two are actually mirror images. However, with the addition of a 3-methyl group, as in a-and P-prodine (Figs. 2 and 3), one conformer becomes preferred.' For a-prodine, the energy difference between the two is only 0.5 kcal/mol. In contrast, the energy difference is a substantial 3.7 kcal/mol in P-prodine. Thus, in a-prodine, both of the phenyl equatorial conformers will be significantly populated, whereas P-prodine is conformat...