1984
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90147-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the mechanisms underlying septal area control of hypothalamically elicited aggression in the cat

Abstract: This experiment was performed in order to examine several of the underlying mechanisms by which the septal area and adjacent regions regulate quiet biting attack behavior elicited from electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus in the cat. The results clearly indicate that stimulation of the septal area and anterior cingulate gyrus increased the latency for the occurrence of quiet biting attack behavior. Those sites within the septal area from which inhibition of attack can be produced are linked to sensory me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within that frame, the direct septal connection with the thalamic nucleus DMA, reported in the chick, may be particularly important (Montagnese et al, 2003), since part of this nucleus could be the equivalent of the mammalian thalamic mediodorsal nucleus. In mammals, this nucleus receives septal afferents (Hreib et al, 1988) and is connected with the prefrontal cortex and LHy, two major sites related to the control of aggression (Brutus et al, 1984).…”
Section: Functional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within that frame, the direct septal connection with the thalamic nucleus DMA, reported in the chick, may be particularly important (Montagnese et al, 2003), since part of this nucleus could be the equivalent of the mammalian thalamic mediodorsal nucleus. In mammals, this nucleus receives septal afferents (Hreib et al, 1988) and is connected with the prefrontal cortex and LHy, two major sites related to the control of aggression (Brutus et al, 1984).…”
Section: Functional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it can be argued that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may be involved in the communication of affect, and that lesions to this area may result in aggression by disrupting the animal's ability to communicate cues about its affective state (e.g., threat behavior) [Kling, 1976;Miller and Levine, 19771. However, on the other hand, it can also be argued that the dorsolateral region is but one portion of an interconnected system of neural circuits that exert inhibitory influences on aggressive impulses which are known to have their origin in various subcortical structures [Brutus et al, 1984;Siegel and Edinger, 1983;Watson et al, 19831. Investigations which have compared the effects of dorsolateral and orbital lesions on aggression appear to shed further light on this issue. Butter et al [1968] tested two groups of macaques, one with bilateral ablations of the dorsolateral prefrontal region and the other with bilateral ablations of the orbital region.…”
Section: Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within that frame, the direct septal connection with the thalamic nucleus DMA, reported in the chick, may be particularly important (Montagnese et al, 2003), since part of this nucleus could be the equivalent of the mammalian thalamic mediodorsal nucleus. In mammals, this nucleus receives septal afferents (Hreib et al, 1988) and is connected with the prefrontal cortex and LHy, two major sites related to the control of aggression (Brutus et al, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%